Posted by: 3076491?
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/4/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 124
SCP: 3
3 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17169688? ago (edited ago)
Thats not true. If you post thousands of messages, often using words and phrases tump uses, talking about things going on with trump, then eventually some are going to line up like that. It's not proof of anything. You're just ingoring all the times that it doesn't line up like that. By you're logic, I could say that trump is coordinating with cnn because of all the time they posted a story then trump talked about that story.
[–] 17169970? ago
You’re trying too hard. My logic is flawless. Your idea about frequent posts making it seem like coordination fails too.
In your cnn example, YES!! Trump IS paying attention to cnn and his post proves that!
As to scattershot (q posting a lot)... that’s also a no-go.
A post takes, say, 5 minutes to compose and let’s say for the sake of your argument, that Q posts twice what he does and do does trump. If we allow 16 hours a day ... I don’t have a way to calculate it right now but you can. Look up “birthday paradox.” Substitute (Q’s post frequency + Trumps) / (16 x 20) and substitute the numbers. Then cancel 1/2 and you’re close.