You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 17167675? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

but my guard is up.

there is absolutely 0% chance that Trump doesn’t sanction Q. He necessarily does. The body of information points to that fact inescapably.

Thes 2 things seem contradictory to me. There is no evidence of trump sancioning q. There isn't even evidence that q is really in insider. There's nothing q has done that couldn't have been done by anyone.

I would like to see what evidence you have though.

0
0

[–] 17168093? ago  (edited ago)

Kid: “Is Q real?” Trump: “I don’t know..... But I know that they’re good people.”

Add that to the Q confirmation style stuff, particularly Q post being negative delta — that leaves plausible deniability but not much more.

As to the majority of people oversimplifying and not “getting it” - that’s just the way the world works. Q can’t increase iq. But he can point the smarter people to how to dig through facts to discover what the msm isn’t spoon feeding them. Almost nobody was doing that before. Now, since Q, there’s more data here (feeding from the Chan trunk) than on some of the strongest alt-news collectors.

0
0

[–] 17168250? ago 

Source on that trump quote? Them posting at similar times isn't proof of anything. Why would it be? Is q telling trump "I just posted so you need to post in exactly 3 minutes and 16 seconds so that we can make people aware of the number 316". Come on, you know that is silly. For someone that claims their guard is up, its very weird to claim that the time difference between q posts and trump tweets is proof of anything, especially when trump posts several times a day. You take the time difference in between q posts and trump posts as evidence that q is real, but do you take all the times that q posted without a trump tweet immedietly afterwards, or trump tweets being posted without q posting recently as evidence that q isn't real? Be real, you're using faulty logic. You're guard isn't up at all.