You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17166883? ago 

Yeah- but there are other possible reasons for giving that appearance than one first assumes.

For example, it demonstrates fakery. It could also be pointing to twit actions (Dorsey.) It could be an error, but it also wouldn’t be out of character to pose a question (as a problem to solve) where the grade-level got kicked up. I am absolutely unable to trivialize that event as an error. Toit, If it was, Q’s natural move would be to clarify unequivocally and that hasn’t happened.

0
0

[–] 17167112? ago 

I am absolutely unable to trivialize that event as an error.

Because you're brainwashed. Q could personally tell you himself that it's all bullshit and you'd still find a way to "decode" it and turn it into some secret message about the deep state.

0
0

[–] 17167549? ago  (edited ago)

No. I’m not a low iq observer. I’m on guard against exactly that: I could say possible analyses of Q that are jarring but my guard is up.

I’ll give one fundamental point: there is absolutely 0% chance that Trump doesn’t sanction Q. He necessarily does. The body of information points to that fact inescapably.

Some of the things a minority of people decode seems to have very little support and disproportionatly large interpretation, and that’s suspect. In fact, it’s EXACTLY how I would run a disinformation op against Q.

This has a very different character. You’re oversimplifying.