You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 17116659? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think that the exact time must be significant. Reason- there was confusion over what the correct reading of the time was the last time Q used this same watch. Yet Q used the same watch again. If Q didn't want to communicate the exact time, down to the second, he would use a watch without a second hand.

My problem with my own theory, is why doesn't Q just use a digital clock? What significance is there to this particular watch?

Edit. After some quick research, it appears that even calling this time piece a "watch" is technically inaccurate, as it is a "chronograph." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronograph

A chronograph is a specific type of watch that is used as a stopwatch combined with a display watch. A basic chronograph has an independent sweep second hand; it can be started, stopped, and returned to zero by successive pressure on the stem. More complex chronographs use additional complications and can have multiple independent hands to measure seconds, minutes, hours and even tenths of a second. In addition, many modern chronographs use moveable bezels as tachymeters for rapid calculations of speed or distance. Louis Moinet invented the chronograph in 1816 for use in tracking astronomical objects.[1][2] Chronographs were also used heavily in artillery fire in the mid to late 1800s. More modern uses of chronographs involve piloting airplanes, car racing, diving and submarine maneuvering...

0
0

[–] 17117280? ago 

Wasn't the last one 3:14:50 or something like that? Maybe the delta between times is significant? Q said follow the watch, and this is the second drop we've seen it.