So my initial knee-jerk reaction was similar to many other's today, "Why would POTUS sign such an awful bill?". Then I stopped myself and started thinking logically. There's something more here, something more going on. I did some research, listened to some clips with Congressmen and here's what I came up with....
Trump told us in his kick-off campaign the other night in El Paso that they were "We're setting the stage. We're setting the table." https://youtu.be/qaeK9js9I_4
Then, I heard that there were congressional members who weren't comfortable with the bill as it was but that POTUS assured them that if they passed it, he would be willing to sign it IF they would support him in declaring a National Emergency. So, pay attention to the primary supporters of the National Emergency. They've already started support for it before it's even been announced as I write this theory.
SO, to keep from causing more pain and suffering and the deadlock that the House would surely engage in, he's going to sign the bill.
But, if you've been paying attention, he's building the wall and has said as much... https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1095523879689293825
It's even been confirmed... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/its-true-trump-really-did-start-building-more-wall-in-texas
Many have thought that maybe he was bluffing about a National Emergency. Dems threatened to take him to court if he does. (He is COUNTING on that. - Don't worry, I'll explain.) Dems keep saying that he doesn't have the authority to move money around without approval from Congress. This is where they are wrong. Q asked this question... "What vested auth does the Constitution grant a sitting President re: matters of NAT SEC?" in drop 2502 and then thanked Soros for his help in this matter. What does that mean? It's explained perfectly here: (make sure to read through the ENTIRE post) https://twitter.com/SaRaAshcraft/status/1067101670692323328
We now know the stage is being set. All of them have been playing their roles and right into Trump's & Q's hands. But where is he going to get all the money if the Dems tie him up in court? According to Vic Mulvaney here's where he's going to get it: https://youtu.be/Rr92yZXJK44?t=18
Now, while they come after him in court, he's going to keep working on the wall that's already started plus you have the military to hold the border. They'll pick their favorite court to get what they want. It'll be appealed. Eventually, it'll work it's way up to the SCOTUS. He's put 2 justices on the court that are constitutionalists. But, right now, we only see 8 justices because 1 is MIA but supposedly still participating in cases from home. And, it was reported that she recently attended a concert. Or did she? (0:21-3:02) https://youtu.be/AqG1z451hRI?t=21
Now, the question is, when will she either ACTUALLY show up or when will they announce that she died? https://truepundit.com/ruth-bader-blackout/ I'm thinking that her death is going to be used (much like Bush Sr.) as a distraction/delay tactic for this case making its way through the SCOTUS. Dems will do what they can to stall and will say that there has to be 9 on the court before it can make a ruling (or the justices can opt for this), hoping to delay things even further. See, they want this to be an issue for the next Presidential election. But, a previously retired justice can be brought back to the court on a temporary basis and most likely it will be Kennedy.
However, the part that I still haven't pinned down is what the President is going to do with all of the corrupt congressional members during the National Emergency when he starts utilizing everything in his power as defined by the Constitution (mentioned in the Tweet link above).
Things are just getting started folks. So grab your popcorn and pay attention.
And, here's another little tidbit for FYI: https://twitter.com/inthematrixxx/status/977540875323691011?lang=en
Edit: RBG Blackout link added above.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16794777? ago
Great breakdown of what likely is going to happen. I would like to think of other matters are of NAT SEC as well - such as FISAGATE, U2, Fast and Furious, Vegas, 9/11 just to name a few.
[–] 16794814? [S] ago
Understandably, I chose to go with 1 angle on this. There is a lot more involved, but that's too much for one post. I wanted to specifically address the tie-in to SCOTUS.