Posted by: 3033334?
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: 1.8 years ago on
Archived on: 5/14/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 6344
SCP: 158
161 upvotes, 3 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16744485? 1 point 18 points 19 points (+19|-1) ago
Did you read today's report?
They knew about these databases and these texts when they issued their report two months ago.
Today they are just issuing a recommendation
The recommendation is basically update your policy and use a better back up system. Nothing earthshaking happened today. Nothing even desk shaking happened today.
[–] 16747085? 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
You mean news that the e-mails that have damning information they thought they so cleverly ( desperately ) Destroyed aren't lost after all ? That IG Horowitz and Prosecuting Attorney John Huber aren't already discussing what charges to bring to a Grand Jury against them all isn't Earthshaking to them ? Bet more than 1 person needed to change their Depends. Couple that with the Weiner Laptop Investigation coming out into the Public. Yea just another day in Paradise I guess. Peace Y
[–] 16750861? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You're completely wrong. You didn't read the report whatsoever. The IG does not make this claim AT ALL.
Justice Dept IG blames FBI-wide software failure for missing Strzok-Page messages https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-department-ig-blames-fbi-wide-software-failure-for-missing-strzok-page-messages-says-phones-were-wiped
No evidence FBI tried to destroy Peter Strzok or Lisa Page texts, IG report finds https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/no-evidence-fbi-tried-to-destroy-peter-strzok-lisa-page-ig-report-finds
Given that you are completely wrong above, this follow on is completely wrong as well.
Um, the IG already spoke this. Devoted a whole chapter to it. It totally demolishes many of the myths about the Weiner Laptop that were told and retold
[–] 16744905? [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The way this is worded, it’s hard to tell if this is how texts were initially recovered or if this recovered more texts then we’ve already seen. Not sure
[–] 16750614? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is not saying more texts were recovered since their report in December.
The December report discussed this database at length.
https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2018/i-2018-003523.pdf,