Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 115
SCP: 2
2 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16605893? ago
Stopping feminism at home is a bigger problem.
Mixed opinion on the negotiations. Endlessly fighting mountain people isn't really helping us. On the flip side, I don't think the Taliban can prevent ISIS/Al Qaeda from reforming because they don't have central leadership the way some people think they do.
[–] 16607392? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
The "feminists" at home are the Taliban. Not shitting you, they're run by a Pakistani who was Bush and Obama's "special representative to Muslim communities", and Anita Sarkeesian was on someone's payroll to run PR for Islamists. The Rockefeller groups that run the network are also laundering funds for Hamas.
[–] 16607404? ago (edited ago)
Yeah they're a really big problem.
[–] 16608341? ago
^ MGTOW Faggot just go back there.
[–] 16613810? ago
I'm not a MGTOW. Give me a girlfriend
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] 16606121? ago
To back up a bit: The key negotiating point is the that Taliban have to swear never again to harbor foreign terrorists in exchange for peace.
The thing is, I don't think they can live up to that because they can't control 100% of the country.