You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 16589500? ago 

Of course Q could post prior to and simply conflate the date with something else already posted and post a new narrative regarding this.

Q, real or not, no one can predict 100% what will happen. Statistical algorithms can go a long way but there is no way to concretely predict which of the all possible and impossible outcomes will happen. That my friends is a dubious arrogance.

Also, Q real or not, says he posts disinformation (lies). That being the case, then, Q is an unpredictable and unreliable source of information. That really can’t be argued.

If, I admit I’m a liar and I tell you that at times I’m telling you lies (no matter the reason), then, it is impossible to trust completely, if at all, in what I say.

Had Q said he was “incorrect sometimes” or “that plans had to change or adjust to a new dynamic) or “here’s the plan and we are going to try to get as close to completing it as laid out as possible,” then Q would have much more credibility.

Q isn’t God. And the military and government are not the harbingers of doing everything the best way in the first place.

However, I think we are past how much any of this matters at this point. I think Q is a different animal than most have come to believe. Q is providing a different narrative and does it mysteriously - so it is compelling and interesting.

Whatever Q is, in this case, the ends may justify the means. You are paying attention. So that’s a good thing. And with the exception of the fake racists and shills, you’ve come together here to share info and ideas. That is possibly a precursor to something good. I guess we’ll find out.

Vote me down but I raise obvious and concrete points. And for what it’s worth, I’m not against the Q faithful or think you are all stupid. You just want things to be better and different and Q has given you hope.

I also hope for these same ideals that Q projects.