Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/7/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 3621
SCP: 252
254 upvotes, 2 downvotes (99% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16590699? 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
They absolutely are. The 2nd Amendment says:
This is being restricted as a taboo form of armament. Which is an infringment upon our right to keep and bear arms.
You will have to forgive my skepticism. Rights, once encroached upon, are rarely ever restored or expanded upon. They only tend to shrink, and our natural right to defend ourselves and keep our rulers in check has already been unreasonably restricted. I will never budge on this.
[–] 16590792? ago
You do realize what bump stocks are right?
It isn't infringing on anything.
Love needs to get used more often. Logic as well.
[–] 16590901? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
They are a piece of rigid plastic which makes it easier to fire a gun in such a fashion as to rapidly depress the trigger.They aren't a gun, they are a part of a gun. But banning specific gun parts is just as noxious and unforgivable as banning entire weapons or types of weapons.
You are doing a shit job of convincing me that their banning isn't a betrayal.
Stuff your hippy shit. Love won't stop deep state bullets. Love won't topple tyrants. Force, and the ability to project it in defense of those we Love, is necessary.