NSFW Anon Archived Q 938 and the etymology of the word NATION...thisll surprise you! (QRV)
submitted ago by 2988048?
Posted by: 2988048?
Posting time: 1.9 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 4/23/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1226
SCP: 9
15 upvotes, 6 downvotes (71% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived Q 938 and the etymology of the word NATION...thisll surprise you! (QRV)
submitted ago by 2988048?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16314620? ago
i'll take that as a no. but i'll keep my eyes open for it being wrong.
[–] 16316248? [S] ago
SSI take everything Q says as a no too, as Qs purpose is to get us to research ourselves. That was my point. No hand holding here
[–] 16316937? ago
This my research: Most info indicates that nation (and variants) is etymologically made of 2 parts - natus (and variants) relating to birth, and -ion (and variants) used in Latin to make a noun from other word types. The T (or sc) comes with the first part, as in nativity and nascent. A -tion ending only occurs when the first part already has a T, (or C) as in creation where the verb create can be made into a noun with a related meaning by adding -ion. Etymonline.com says this:
-ion word-forming element attached to verbs, making nouns of state, condition, or action, from French -ion or directly from Latin -ionem (nominative -io, genitive -ionis), common suffix forming abstract nouns from verbs.
Whereas their entry for -tion explains that the form exists when the T is part of the base word. www.etymonline.com/word/-tion#etymonline_v_13348
You seem to be saying that all words that end in -tion (or variants) are for some reason indicating something Zionist. Did the pre-Christian Romans take up this concept when they formed words that we know now such as constitution or election?
Maybe you have some special sources or research methods. Why not share them?