Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 3/8/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 768
SCP: 40
42 upvotes, 2 downvotes (95% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 15453721? 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
But he isn't. Nor is Q. To pretend otherwise is literally (literally) delusional.
Look at Q's endless tirades of "patriots have no skin colour" "race doesn't matter" "white supremacists are evil" etc. What is the destructive path europe is on right now? It's the endless importation of non-europeans. To pretend that mild socalistic tendencies or mild anti democratic tendencies are the real problem compared to this is completely delusional. The issue is shitskins, and the fact they aren't europeans, can't hold european values, and never fucking will.
How could trump + Q solve this? Maybe stop pretending any presumption all races aren't equal is literal evil. That'd do decently for a start. I'm not even saying ideology (i.e muslims vs non muslims) isn't an important factor, but americans who feel this is critical really ought to look up black crime rates. I'd rather have 10% muslims, than 10% blacks, by a long fucking way.
So are Q and Trump doing anything to help? No, not really. If anything, they're only making it worse by pretending the issue is anything more than the presence of non europeans in europe.
[–] 15455804? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
a) being against massive, non-organic and highly disruptive migrations/invasions by predominantly race X into predominantly race Y's country is not the same as being generally against race X or proof of race X being inferior/inherently problemaitc because of race X being race X. skin color and race does not matter when social compacts are understood and respected, which any homo sapien is capable of doing.
b) high black crime rates are a manufactured result of one of the many branches of social engineering by powerful elites. not a result of blacks being blacks.
[–] 15455819? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Absolutely this anon gets it ^^^^
[–] 15459102? ago
a.) yeah whatever, I'll grant you this one, provided you grant that it does make it more complex to deny the rights of them to do so, and as a result leads to potential genocide of the more generous race.
b.) absolutely fucking not, you cretin. Blacks have low IQ's. This isn't "social engineering" (although that may play a small role), it is their genetics, hence why they were like this even before europeans stepped foot in Africa. Know what else is correlated with low IQ? Did you guess violence? Have a cookie. Did the evil elites literally genetically modify their dna such that they have much higher presence of this particular gene, linked to "shooting and stabbing behaviours" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24326626). Oh, they didn't? So, blacks are, at least to some degree, literally more criminal due to their genetics?
Imagine my shock.
The presence of some social factors further fucking them over does not mean their genetics are not also trash tier.
[–] 15456593? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Even if 90% of Jews were involved, but of course they are not, then punishing 100% of Jews would be an injustice against the 10%. Same with every other group, including Blacks. Therefore, the only just, fair, and honest solution is to judge each individual based on the evidence of their deeds and actions and of course that does include conspiracy, but only people who are guilty should be held accountable. It's not about race or religion, even if significant numbers might be involved. Q is right and Trump too, racism is wrong. Only punish those who we can prove are guilty of a crime. That will make a huge change in the world for the better but we will have to wait for God himself to deliver a perfect world. We can't do it ourselves nor should we try. God bless the USA, our patriots, and all those who oppose evil and corruption everywhere.
[–] 15459067? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I understand the logic you're using , but its wrong. Think of it like this - while there are indeed innocent parties, crime rates within a demographic should not be ignored. We may not know which, roughly speaking 10-20% of black males will be rapists, murders, and thieves. We can't tell from the outside. However, we can tell that that small group is so violent that as a result of ignoring them, fully 50% of the TOTAL rapes and murders will be caused by them, even despite them making up roughly 4% of the population (black males, 15-40y.o). We can therefore know with certainty that by removing them, or heavily discriminating against them, we could reduce the murder and rape rate by 50%.
A failure to do so means you are willing to trade fully half of everyone in the US raped or murdered in exchange for your desire to seem "unbiased". Their deaths are on your head - you are the equivelant of someone who fails to report a wildly suspicious person to the police who then goes on to murder someone. You don't literally have blood on your hands, but make no mistake, you are somewhat culpable, at a moral level.
Not subjecting others to the heightened violence rates of blacks is a moral cause, even if they'd rather they were able to stay and leech off whitey. The right to self defence is God given, and it is a calm and rational response to what is clearly a threat, even if the precise sources of that threat cannot be identified ahead of time. God helps those who help themselves.
[–] 15457142? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I shouldn't be saying this but I have on good authority that Q himself is black. So what do you think about that?
[–] 15458963? ago
It'd have been done better if he was white most likely.
Or to put it another way, for every black man qualified to lead such an op, there are at least (at least) 30 times as many whites and asians per capita. Since whites > blacks at about a 5:1 ratio anyway, that means the odds of him actually having been the best man for the job are easily <1%. And well, we all know affirmative action is a thing.
So you think him being black ,even if true, would be a good thing? lololol