Let's just use two drops to clarify this issue. Drop 1868 and drop 2514. In the first drop mentioned above you see a clear and blunt statement to not associate the plane in Arkansas with the CF. It also notes that NY points to UT. Utah has two important things, if not 3.
We can use drop 2514 to identify that the whistleblower is coming from Utah. Who, or what, it is is is still up for debate, if you ask me. First, lets look at the words in the kill boxes. They are, in order of appearance:
1.[Utah] 2.[this is the] 3.[something] 4.[in]
Next we see near the end of the post Q says, "Future will prove past".(That's a popular Q Quote) In this drop I believe it to follow another popular Q them. "Double meanings exist". The first instance of the double meaning can be found within the drop itself. It is illustrated by moving the first word in a kill box([Utah]) to the end of the string of words in kill boxes. This allows the future to prove the past. It makes the statement true. It now reads [this is the] [something] [in] [Utah]. Future kill boxes proving a past kill box as a true statement. I would also like to point out the word choice of [something], and that you should remember it for the future. 😎
A second illustration of "double meanings exist" is the fact that the newly revised kill box statement literally means the whistleblower isn't new. They are a past whistleblower that was a former CF employee and they never had contact with this particular office of the government. That is clearly stated in the drop. That should narrow our list of possible names to a number we could realistically discern the identity of said WB.
There are a couple more Qlues in the wording chosen by the reporters speaking with Hannity. The first one can be seen in this quote, "JOHN S.:No, this is a new—a different whistleblower...". Here John purposely cuts himself off after saying "new", so that he can correctly state it as a "different" WB. Different from Dennis Nathan Cain is the perceived message.
The second Qlue to help narrow the list can be seen in an excerpt from Sara's statement. "And I think the American people are going to see that there was [something] happening behind the scenes at the FBS as well as the Dept of Justice." This is pointning directly at the FBS (https://www.state.gov/f/strategies/fbs/index.htm) and the DOJ. It is also another example of future proves past. I say this because in the past HRC used to use the FBS in correlation with her wrongdoings at the CF, and now, fast-forwarding to the future, we will see the FBS used to expose those misdeeds. Can anyone see the name of the whistleblower from the past yet? Here's another Qlue to aid you in your dig. (Think a children's game) Sara said we need to keep our eyes...(Think Open)
Lastly, let's return to [something]. Could that [something] be a thing and not a person? Could that [something] point to the NSA and General Flynn? If it does it's going to be taking alotta bytes out of crime perpetrated by the cunt named Hillary Clinton.
-QlueAnon
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 15450718? ago
Homie, REAL “Mormons”(No I’m not supposed to call people of my religious affiliation by that term.) haven’t practiced polygamy for YEARS.... knock it off with that F(ake)LDS shit. I have 1 wife and that’s all I want. In fact, I don’t know a single person in Utah who is married to multiple people, and I have lived on this earth for 28 years. Turn your TV off and stop listening to people who aren’t credible.. Also... to be clear, no, a lot of us don’t think Mitt Romney is great, I personally wish he would just go away. His nephew was my mission companion, I knew he was running for president before the MSM did, this kid is still a good friend of mine
[–] 15451239? ago
Latter Day Saint here. Not mentioning anything about polygamy but the Kingston's fraud trial and how far into government it could reach. Easy fella.