You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] 15343596? [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I perfectly laid out the western involvement in Crimea. You are daft. My comparison of it to guccifer was to show false belief in public narratives, which makes it entirely appropriate. You just don’t have a counter argument. You are sticking your fingers in your ears and saying “I can’t hear you”. You can’t claim straw man when I am presenting first hand accounts which would even be admissible to court. Stop trying to sound superior by softly attacking my character in lieu of logic or argument. You are taking mainstream cover stories as fact.

0
0

[–] 15360726? ago  (edited ago)

Ok so, few corrections...I'm not talking about Russian hacking. I'm not talking about the MSM narrative that Russia is the bad guy. I see now that you were...I'm going bigger than that, and you completely missed my point.

The Crimean War--the first one, the one where the pre-WW1 western powers tried to stop Russia in Crimea is the narrative I'm talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_War

The modern narrative (not a history book) that Russia controlled the Ukrainian election with hostility and that the EU were good, nice, wonderful people trying to save Ukraine from mean, nasty Russia, I know is bullshit.

Not saying Russia didn't influence the election--they did, and their candidate won. The EU candidate lost so, guess who (fake jewish guy), started a violent revolution with EU money?

What I was pointing out is that the fundamentals of the modern narrative that ARE true (EU vs. Russia) is very similar to the Crimean War in the 1850s and has fundamentally the same reason--control of warm water ports especially Sevestopol--and nosy western powers trying to stop Russia from getting those economically and strategically important ports.

That's not buying an MSM bullshit narrative. I know Russia had their guy in Crimea. I know they funded him, and you know how? Because HE WON, and because the real mess started when the EU tried to start another proxy war using money.

I'm not buying 100% that Putin is an ally--no way. Right now, the enemy of my globalist socialist enemy...sure, but Putin is still acting in the best interests of Putin and Russia. Russia needs Crimea and needs Syria. Putin still uses strong-arm tactics in Russia. He's still effectively a dictator. He's going to use Trump to get what he wants for himself, just like Trump will do the same to him. Do I think they both realize there is a much larger enemy out there?

Absolutely, but even with the common enemy, there is still friction between our foreign policies in that we support Israeli action in Syria while Russia very much does not--only it's no longer a matter of regime change, but a matter of stopping a clandestine Iranian nuclear program

. I don't think the US was ever heavily invested in Crimea--the intel I have in that area suggests that the EU and one particular fake-Jewish instigator were the primary cause of the problems there. My intel comes from former military and NSA colleagues. Oddly, one of my blind spots here is the US. I know the EU funded the opposition, but i don't THINK that the US had anything to do with it--like we so obviously did in Syria under Obama. My sources will obviously be just as pro-US biased as I am here though so...could be wrong.

If you're buying that Putin is all Mr. Sweet and Innocent--remember the soccer ball. Beware of KGB agents bearing gifts.

0
1

[–] 15360995? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Never said Putin was a good person. He is an ally. He has been fighting for the Alliance longer than trump. I have high level contacts too. They all believe the same intel as they have no reason to doubt it. It’s allowed to go on because if the people of the US knew the truth they would riot then war. But those of us who lived it know what really happened. (Edit: I am now back to the 2016 election)

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 15360609? [S] ago 

You are seriously just talking out of your ass. You actually have to inflate your own ego in the middle of your response just to sound convincing. “I can’t help sounding superior “. No one said you do. That reality exists in your own head. Keep shilling. You’ve changed your argument too many times to be genuine.