You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] 15073142? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Ha why are you self labeling as a shill? I agree with what you said here. However, if you take this single non-conclusive yet "interesting" proof, and combine it with all of the other non-conclusive "interesting" proofs, it begins to beg the question-- how many "coincidences" before mathematically impossible? Q has been asking anon's this question for as long as I remember being into Q.