You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
5

[–] 14952904? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It helps establish that there is no evidence of entrapment. They will not be able to say that they were forced by circumstances into making mistakes. By destroying evidence and perpetuating a cover-up it can be show that the trap caught "unwary criminals" and not "unwary innocents".

If it's true that video evidence and marked ballots were used then the destruction of the ballots provides a much stronger case.

On the other hand - it could be so screwed up that they get away with it for now.

0
2

[–] 14953661? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I can't imagine there's no solid proof. They had those videos of people dumping votes in for 2016. No way they weren't looking at the same places or other target locations.