NSFW Anon Archived Section 4 of the 14th amendment voids all government debt incurred by insurrection or rebellion. Hmmmm (QRV)
submitted ago by 2821650?
Posted by: 2821650?
Posting time: 2.1 years ago on
Last edit time: 2.1 years ago on
Archived on: 1/29/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1446
SCP: 45
47 upvotes, 2 downvotes (96% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
NSFW Anon Archived Section 4 of the 14th amendment voids all government debt incurred by insurrection or rebellion. Hmmmm (QRV)
submitted ago by 2821650?
Sort: Top
[–] 14743317? 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago (edited ago)
the USA INC debt is not our debt, POTUS has hinted as much
This country owes nothing, the business entity they set up owes 20+ Trillion and will inevitably default and I don't see much recourse the world has on that subject. We certainly do not owe anything to countries that continually undermine the USA... positively an act of war. Our first response will be to nullify the debt, what better time to do so than when dismantling the Fed?
[–] 14744544? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
this shit right here!!!
[–] 14746574? ago
China is going to fucking hurt when that happens.
Paper dragon.
[–] 14743032? 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
[–] 14744227? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Section 3 looks like it could apply to Tim Kaine for giving aid to his ANTIFA son.
I'm thinking section (edit- 4) could apply to certain banks that have done business with certain terrorist organizations; or other organizations that have worked to undermine the USA. I wonder if this could be used to wipe the debts against every bank that has ever loaned money to a country that has spied on the USA?
[–] 14744503? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
This could be used to nullify debt to China, UK, Aus et all, Especially with evidence of attempted coup and attempting to influence the election
[–] 14744792? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
OBAMA TOOK ON at least 10 TRILLION
WE CAN CALL ALL THAT A BIG ZERO !!! BRENNAN IS SO SAD !!!
Traitors will be HUNG !!!
[–] 14744880? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
CANCEL ALL STUDENT LOANS because the debts were incurred to have commie teachers incite rebellion against the United States
[–] 14744938? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You know ... that might actually work. Plenty of recordings out there of recruitment and subversion in schools. would love to see that case get it's day.
[–] 14743459? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
What about private debt? That's more important.
[–] 14747046? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I believe some will be wiped and not all. Student loans will get to null as well.
[–] 14748755? ago
That's good. I don't plan on paying those fuckers back anyway.
[–] 14746685? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The Federal Reserve Note cannot Constitutionally be "tender in the payment of debts":
1) Congress is not granted any authority in the Constitution to make anything whatsoever "tender in the payment of debts."
2) The Constitution grants the power of controlling what is, or is not, "tender in the payment of debts" to the several states.
3) The several states are Constitutionally prohibited from making anything other than gold and silver coins "tender in the payment of debts."
US Sovereign debt cannot be Constitutionally paid back for that reason alone. That said, I think the 14th Amendment argument also has merit, as does the legal requirement that contracts be for a legal purpose. Funding Unconstitutional government programs is not a legal purpose. Nor is using "money" that can't Constitutionally be money to fund the government, nor using it to bind the Federal government to repayment thereof.
[–] 14744769? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nice Find !
[–] 14743302? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You can't enforce an illegal contract.