(disclaimer...I earned a B.A. degree in logic)
P = Premise (premises are facts that are considered common knowledge, are self-evident, or are otherwise assumed to be true)
C = Conclusion (conclusions are deduced to be true via the rules of logic by combining 2 premises and/or other conclusions)
...so here goes...
P1. If Qanon is false, then its opponents would correctly call it a conspiracy theory.
P2. If Qanon is true, then its incorrect opponents would still call it a conspiracy theory.
C1. Therefore, any statement that claims "Qanon is a conspiracy theory" is a statement that does not depend on whether the facts surrounding that statement are true or false. (P1+P2)
P3. If one makes a statement, and that statement does not depend on whether the facts surrounding that statement are true or false, then that statement is factually useless.
C2. Therefore, any statement that claims "Qanon is a conspiracy theory" is a statement that is factually useless. (C1+P3)
P4. Idiots are people who say things that are factually useless.
C3. Therefore, idiots are people who say "Qanon is a conspiracy theory." (P4+C2)
P5. The MSM say that Qanon is a conspiracy theory.
C4. Therefore, the MSM are idiots. (C3+P5)
...
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 14588779? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You're right, I was referred here by CNN claiming you to be false, but giving 0 facts just a blanket statement that you are fake. Sparked my interest and as for the guy below... I like to know who my enemies are and what they are planning against us, so I do critically check out some MSM. I question their narrative and ask myself what's the end game? Sometimes it's nothing or appears to be, sometimes it is quite devious.