You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 14332526? [S] ago 

Way to be deliberately obtuse and attempt to change the subject. The original post had nothing to do with politics.

It was about morality and using religion to justify otherwise immoral behavior.

Not so hypothetically there is a particular religion that fits the bill of the hypothetical situation the OP talked about.

There are also plenty of Q folks who claim to be Christian who are jumping in to defend said religion because Q said so I think is what the OP was getting at.

But then again I also get the feeling you knew that already. Might even say you've read the book on it. So you just enjoy the weather in Tel Aviv I'm going to kick back with a nice bacon cheese burger and watch the show.

0
0

[–] 14332849? ago  (edited ago)

BTW... You do realize that right after your little anonymous number thingy there is an [S] that indicates YOU are the OP?

This line indicates you are pretending that you aren't the OP : "There are also plenty of Q folks who claim to be Christian who are jumping in to defend said religion because Q said so I think is what the OP was getting at."

Learn to troll better.

0
0

[–] 14332783? ago 

This is a political board. Perhaps you should ask your questions on a religious board.

If the intent is strictly about moral choices based upon religious ideology - neither the question nor the answers you may receive would be specific to Q followers.

There are "plenty of folks" who profess, proclaim, subscribe.... to Christian beliefs and are not Q followers, some hold totally opposing political views and others are apolitical.

As stated, unless there is some other motivation behind the original question - you would be better served making your inquiry on a religious or philosophical board.

The Shill card doesn't work here, nor does the race card, the rape card, the gay card. When will it occur to you that humans with common sense know that one can not prove an intangible. This past week should have taught you that no one should ever be required to prove innocence.