Let's say you move to a new area and you are looking for a new congregation to join. You get invited to join a very exclusive and secretive church and you take them up on it.
You go to your first service and right there beside the KJV in every pew is another book. You don't think much of it figuring it is hymnals or something.
Well the preacher gets up and begins his service let's say it's on something simple like theft. Everyone gets out their bible as he goes over the commandment and relevant chapters and verses in the KJV. So far it's what you might expect of a church service.
Then he asks you to pick up that other book to see what the true meaning of those bible verses is according to the learned elders of the church.
Low and behold what God and Jesus really meant about theft is that it only applies when the theft is from a member of your new sect. As a matter of fact it is your duty and you will be applauded for stealing from members outside of your sect as long as you don't get caught, because whenever God or Jesus talks about people in the Bible they speaking exclusively of your sect.
As a matter of fact they can point you to that other book where it explains how people outside your sect are less than human and exist solely to serve your sect. That your sect are chosen specifically by god and are his only true children so that anything you might do to outsiders is justified as they are less even than the beasts of the field.
Wherever you can and have the opportunity to do so without getting caught it is your duty to god to take every chance to weaken the enemies of your sect. The only time that altruism and charity to outsiders is called for is when it furthers the cause of your sect and makes it look good.
There are generally two ways a person can handle this and feel about these teachings. They can feel justified, exceptional, and arrogant that they are the special children of god. Or they can have empathy and be disgusted and want to rebel against it, to let everyone know what this sect is peddling.
That other book has an answer to that too though. It is the duty of all true believers that they should sentence to death anyone of their own who would reveal the true nature of their teachings to an outsider.
Now as an outsider would you trust this sect as your neighbor, friend, ally? Even if they are not a practicing/observant member, but they and their families have been raised for a thousand generation on these "values"?
That they and their race are are above the rabble of the world. That they can do no wrong as long as it is done against outsiders and they don't get caught. That in their eyes you have less value than the oxen in the field.
If your sect are truly innocent victims why make laws against questioning that innocence and victim hood ? Why have multimillion dollar organizations to blacklist anyone who questions it? Why have an army of shills on the internet to shout down anyone who questions it?
I know if I were an immoral person with evil plans and intentions in my heart my dream world would be one where anyone who calls me out on it automatically becomes the enemy. I could teach Donald Trump a thing or three about Winning! When my battles are won before they are even fought in the hearts and minds of the average person.
Sort: Top
[–] 14330033? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Synagogue of satan. Rev 2:9 and 3:9.
[–] 14330086? [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Any Christian who supports Zionist policy should think real hard about the literal lake of boiling shit Jesus was thrown into for eternity according to the Talmud.
[–] 14329646? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Don't you mean " 'LO' and behold " ?
[–] 14329582? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Hail satan!
[–] 14329567? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
what masonic group did you attend ??
[–] 14329934? ago
Masonic teachings
[–] 14332187? ago (edited ago)
There are already sects of Christianity that hold some of the beliefs you mentioned already. There are also other religions that hold beliefs that are very close to what you have outlined.
That said, with the exception of Catholicism, Mormonism and I believe (could be wrong) - the LDS, the majority of Christian churches use the Bible exclusively and not a "special secret book". The majority - if not ALL churches and sects have their own interpretations of the Bible and the translation of it.
Your question is too broad based. Are you attempting to use religious ideology as an example when you are actually asking a question about political ideology? If so - you are ignoring the fact that most people's religious beliefs affect their political beliefs and not the other way around. How much an effect religious beliefs have is dependent upon each individual's adherence to the tenets of their particular religion and sect. There are people who have both strong religious and political beliefs - but keep those beliefs separate to a degree through compromises. There are also people that hold no religious belief - but hold strong political ideology.
If your question is purely about religion: State your intent.
If your question is about politics using religion as the hypothetical situation: State your intent.
If your question is about governments, ie Democratic, Theocratic, Constitution based Federal Republics: State your intent.
Otherwise this question is simply an invitation to a debate in which you are the only person participating who knows what the topic is.
[–] 14332526? [S] ago
Way to be deliberately obtuse and attempt to change the subject. The original post had nothing to do with politics.
It was about morality and using religion to justify otherwise immoral behavior.
Not so hypothetically there is a particular religion that fits the bill of the hypothetical situation the OP talked about.
There are also plenty of Q folks who claim to be Christian who are jumping in to defend said religion because Q said so I think is what the OP was getting at.
But then again I also get the feeling you knew that already. Might even say you've read the book on it. So you just enjoy the weather in Tel Aviv I'm going to kick back with a nice bacon cheese burger and watch the show.
[–] 14332849? ago (edited ago)
BTW... You do realize that right after your little anonymous number thingy there is an [S] that indicates YOU are the OP?
This line indicates you are pretending that you aren't the OP : "There are also plenty of Q folks who claim to be Christian who are jumping in to defend said religion because Q said so I think is what the OP was getting at."
Learn to troll better.
[–] 14332783? ago
This is a political board. Perhaps you should ask your questions on a religious board.
If the intent is strictly about moral choices based upon religious ideology - neither the question nor the answers you may receive would be specific to Q followers.
There are "plenty of folks" who profess, proclaim, subscribe.... to Christian beliefs and are not Q followers, some hold totally opposing political views and others are apolitical.
As stated, unless there is some other motivation behind the original question - you would be better served making your inquiry on a religious or philosophical board.
The Shill card doesn't work here, nor does the race card, the rape card, the gay card. When will it occur to you that humans with common sense know that one can not prove an intangible. This past week should have taught you that no one should ever be required to prove innocence.
[–] 14330050? [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Wonder how long until JIDF start showing up. It's funny to watch them on voat vs say Reddit or your average comment section. On other sites they play up the guilt angle and try to turn people against the writer and make the writer feel bad for being even vaguely "anti-semetic"
On voat though the vet shills know better and go straight to strawmen and character attacks. You can tell the ones who got transferred with the qtards from Reddit by the way they are having trouble adjusting. Kinda like going from guard duty at the embassy in the U.K. to guard duty in Somolia
[–] 14330705? [S] ago
Looks like they're here already bud. Post full of truth that asks uncomfortable questions. No on topic replies and collecting downvoats.
Here's a fun exercise for anyone who thinks they can research. On any site where you can view a poster's history dig in and look for the patterns in their postings especially from Friday evening to Saturday evening. Look for no posts at all or a change in writing style during those hours.