You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 14163704? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I don't disagree with most of this, but there's one line that really stands out to me - I've seen the same sentiment elsewhere, and its honestly, truly retarded.

It is a literal war for the future of humanity, and there are groups that have some serious weapons,if they suspect they are fucked they are just as likely to nuke the planet as give up control.

Tell me - have these people currently lost - are they blind (no nsa signint), is all their information in the hands of the US military? Do they currently believe rats are ratting out cabal members? That would be the logical inference, yes? At any rate, even if they don't know they've lost yet, they will soon. If they're not literally totally retarded (which they cannot be, given their current/past power), and if what Q says is true, they must know they're loosing, and its only getting worse.

What the hell is stopping them taking their coutnermeasures now? Exactly how do you think they're somehow going to be persuaded to sit on them, not using them, up until such a time as patriots are in a position to disarm them? Does that make any kind of sense, at all? It obviously doesn't, and yet, as I said. I the sentiment is everywhere. why the hell do they not strike back now?

0
0

[–] 14164448? ago 

The sentiment seems to be one of resolve that they can endure Trump as a temporary aberration, then they can take 10-20 years to undo what Trump does.

That's why it is not just a US thing; North Korea was the intended catalyst to world war 3 in 2018-2020, thats why they were a priority. That's why someone fired a missile at Air Force 1 (the missile was shot down) while it was travelling to Singapore, keeping that status quo was critical. Iran with the nuke deal was connected.

Next, looking at the power structures, the people being caught are in the upper-mid levels, not arrested yet, more just logged and the paperwork starting. So, as best as I can interpret the plan, it's one of allowing the crimes to get so bad and overt where there will be no choice but to take action... Not just a blow, but a savaging of every resource that they can in a swift move.

Before that, gotta make sure all the dead man switches are removed, all the leaks plugged, all the drains unclogged, then When the plan is fully exposed there's nothing that they could do as much as they might want.

As far as the last paragraph, those are valid questions where I would need to be guessing too much to offer a valuable response.

0
0

[–] 14166504? ago  (edited ago)

I mostly agree - you are correct about NK (along with framing russia for crimes), and you are correct about the whidbey bay missile + even quite possibly Iran. And yes, the idea they could endure trump and then slowly undo what he has done is a possible reason for not going fully public w/ various things, since at that point the genie can't be put back in the bottle.

I'm not happy, at all about the prospect of waiting for the crimes to get bad and overt before striking, but so long as they're taking measures to ensure these crimes aren't against children, I can tolerate it. But ultimately, I still don't understand how they expect to endgame. I know nobody will have answers on that for now, but it frustrates me almost more than the prospect that these people are still out there committing crimes currently. I think the only route they can take is making deals. Nothing else makes any kind of sense.

  • > >Saving Israel for last for a specific reason
  • > >the sampson option exists (substantially more powerful than claimed too)
  • > >last I checked, Q wasn't making broad moves to shut that down, or to name the jew
  • > >no deals? maybe a special exception for the "greatest ally", I'd presume?