You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] 13989677? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Ockum's Razor analysis says NO. This was the C_A sending RR a message since the NYT is a C_A shill.

For the NYT to publish the article as a result of true investigative journalism would be a very deep outlier based on past performance.

RR has failed in his Firewall mission and responsibilities. DS agents are upset. PDJT does not have to fire RR. He has 'fired' himself. Just a matter of time before he gets torched by the DS, the FISA release, or public demands from NYT public revelations of his misdeeds. Looks from here like a potential "suicide" victim.

0
1

[–] 13989874? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I didn't suggest that NYT published this as some random act of journalism, quite the opposite. I think the story was given to them for a purpose and they dutifully ran it like the stooges they are. It could also have come from Clowns, certainly.

0
0

[–] 13990127? ago 

Your title poses the question that RR was the source of the article. My reply was NO. So then the unasked question left is who did. 1) NYT did via their own investigative resources, or 2) someone other than RR is the source. As you point out in your response to my comment the likely source were Clowns.

I guess you have lost me as to what your post was trying to accomplish other than use up bandwidth and data???? Did if just fall for ....