You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

5
-3

[–] mamwad 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago  (edited ago)

The problem was that you were connecting that information to a voat account. That's why people were upset.

I don't really expect nor care if your subscribers are paragons of reason, but I do expect more from the moderators here. Editorializing a popular post to push a narrative and encourage downvotes is wrong.

0
7

[–] Crensch 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The problem was that you were connecting that information to a voat account. That's why people were upset.

Really? I was under the impression that it was a plethora of accounts spamming a business here.

1
-1

[–] mamwad 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

First, sorry for saying "you." That's not fair.

And while you have a point, I'll say what I said in the original thread. I don't think the punishment for violating the user agreement should be doxxing. Perhaps this information could have been given to Atko and Puttitout privately.

Anyway, my main point is that obviously people are going to disagree about what should be done about any problem the community has. Someone's we aren't going to come to a resolution on a particular matter, but we should at least make an honest attempt. It's why I created /v/voatcongress, and I really do wish more people of varying opinions would populate the sub do we don't have to have these discussions elsewhere. If PV is going to be the executive branch of voat, maybe we need to develop checks and balances.