Here is the link to the comments that was deleted in /v/Islam by @DoritoButtFace.
I was discussing Islam and the moral justify Muhammad's capture and rape of sex slaves or his permission of domestic violence and I left the following comment:
I was going to ask if Muslims could justify the child raping behaviors of their pedophile prophet, but I've already asked literally hundreds of Muslims that question and I get sick of hearing the same answer that it's good to rape little children if they are "asking for it". Besides, discussing such topics with Muslims makes me feel ill after a while because most Muslims seem proud of how disgusting and bestial they are.
Which was deleted by @DoritoButtFace, who claimed it was an insult.
I disagree because my comment is based on reality. I have lived Muslim societies in India in which Muslims are proud of their prophet and his ability to rape his sex slaves and child brides. Even the Sunna describes how Muhammad had the sexual energy of 30 men and how he'd rape all of "his" woman in a 24 hour orgy and then start again and how he's attend public prayer meetings in wet clothing because his wives didn't have time to spot clean all of the semen stains from his clothing. It is common for Muslims to joke at wedding about the groom and Muhammad's sexual energy, for example.
I stand by my comment that Muslims seem proud of how disgusting and bestial their religion is... given how proudly their scripture describes their pedophile prophet's human rights violations against woman and children.
I disagree that it is an insult to respect the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to and to rightfully describe sex slavery and rape and pedophilia as bestial and disgusting.
Since when is opposing rape and pedophilia considered insulting to Voat users?
I though Voat respected free speech... especially when it's true.
Your thoughts?
Sort: Top
[–] InnocentBystander 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
It may be based on reality, but you did phrase it in an insulting way. I think you have every right to be offensive if you want. The comment seems to be relevant to the conversation and makes a point, so should be allowed in my opinion. But it is a small sub. I feel small subs should be allowed to decide how they want to run things. It is a simple matter to replace them with an alternative.
I am not sure we have a consensus on how small subs should be dealt with. Maybe @Kevdude and some of the other PV regulars can weigh in.
[–] guinness2 [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Perhaps this is my mistake: I believed Voat had some sort of commitment to free speech rather than having subverses that are indistinguishable from reddit.
It's such a shame because there are very few places where people can have a honest and sincere discussion about Islam without having Muslims delete and hide and sensor comments because they are offended by human rights and people who claim bashing and raping woman and raping children is disgusting.
What is the point of Voat if it's subverses are censored... people may as well abandon Voat and flock to Reddit.
[–] InnocentBystander 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
It does. You can make a sub with content you want, and it will not be shutdown or censored on you. But that does not mean that you get to decide what is good for everyone else. They get freedom also.
So make a new sub. It only takes a few minutes. /v/IHateIslam or /v/TheTruthOfIslam or anything else. Actually you might want to visit /v/IslamUnveiled. That seems to be the type of sub you are looking for.
Everyone gets free speech here. Not just the free speech you want.
[–] MostlySober 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You make a post here and we harass the mod until he deletes his account.
[–] guinness2 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Seems reasonable :-)
[–] DerpExpress 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago (edited ago)
v/derpexpress post articles here i wont censor.