[–] Mumbleberry 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You see this one? https://voat.co/v/Lolice Modded by a 5 mo old sleeper acct with no history

[–] VapidGopher 1 points 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

You guys are truly the autists we need but we don’t deserve. Awesome job.

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I'll update my post and add him below the others

[–] Mumbleberry 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Looks like they deleted everything.

[–] Mumbleberry 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Only one post there, from a goat calling them out. Sub is 2 days old. Nothing in the modlogs

[–] SIayfire122 4 points 22 points (+26|-4) ago 

@PuttItOut. Voat should have a script that automatically removes inactive mods after x-months, or at least flags them for review.

[–] Germ22 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

A feature like this is coming soon. The community will be able to call for referendums and vote out inactive mods.

[–] MadWorld 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

People who are interested with modding inactive subverses should prepare themselves to meet all requirements necessary, in order to submit transfer requests. Others may want to also meet a different set of requirements, in order to get their votes certified. It is a fair fight with everything on the table.

How to inform others, without waking up sleeper mods?

[–] ExpertShitposter 3 points 11 points (+14|-3) ago 

This. Any user that has never commented, and has not even logged in for 6 months....delete.

[–] Splooge 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

A feature like this would also help to save resources. I dunno how much of a drain account-squatting is, but I'd imagine if bots (both human and automated) were making massive amounts of accounts and letting them sit to "mature" (kek), all the little bits would add up quickly.

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

Found through this faggity anon post, OP of which is too scared of pedos to report publicly.

https://voat.co/v/Lolitary/3027949

[–] friendshipistragic 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

These people give anime fans a bad name. Anime is your greatest ally bakka!

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Anime is an enjoyable art form, it just never attracted me as I don't really have an interest in it.

It's too bad that some morons will associate regular anime and manga to this degenerate crap.

[–] celestial-skylord 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

I always wondered why the "random nsfw subverse" button at the bottom of frontpage has like 50% chance of going to a loli subverse despite there being a fuck ton of nsfw subverses (most of which never get chosen as the random one).

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

If you have them blocked, are they taken out of the shuffle ?

[–] srgmpdns 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

No, unfortunately.

[–] Anti-Stupid 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I clicked it 10 times to test your claim and not once did I get sent to loli subverse.

[–] L3D 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

10 clicks on NSFW rulette, 4 times hit a loli sub, including todcon, don't recommend checking that out. One borderline loli sub too, guro which had some loli stuff in it too, if you don't know what guro is, I don't recommend checking that sub out either...

Landed v/rant, and v/QRV both twice, even though they shouldn't even be marked NSFW.

[–] L3D 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Random buttons give more weight to active subs.

Puritans of Voat drove out proper porn submitters (downvotes, "porn is a Jewish trick" and all that nonsense), but didn't do anything to loli likers. So loli porn is pretty much the only porn left on the site.

[–] celestial-skylord 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Now that's pretty ironic.

[–] Itty-bitty_Tity-trap 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

I get QRV or jews way too often from it

[–] Landrictree 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I always get rule34 feet...Ugh

[–] Wowbagger 4 points 10 points (+14|-4) ago 

Flush the assholes out. Free speech can't apply to anything resembling kiddy porn. Lolis pervs are just weapons of the enemy.

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 1 points 30 points (+31|-1) ago 

No

Free speech applies to all for anything legal on here.

But the loli community does have a shit ton of sexual degenerates amongst its members and we should keep a close eye on them. I wouldn't be surprised if illegal content followed with them.

[–] yellowthread 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

He's right though, kiddy porn is what they use to shut down sites and detain people indefinitely.

You don't really believe all the people leaking government secrets coincidentally get caught with kiddy porn after seeing the government has tools to put things onto peoples computers, do you?

Letting them thrive here leads to the end of the site. Only leftist sites are allowed to have illegal stuff anywhere.

[–] Hand_of_Node 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Both free speech and consequences can apply.

[–] JJNova 6 points 6 points (+12|-6) ago 

TO THE FIRES WITH THEM!

"Get rid of the ink, the paper, and the computer monitors. They can be used to make books I don't like! Er, oops, I mean, PEOPLE CAN DRAW THINGS I DON'T LIKE! Look how dangerous this art is! It's basically pedophilia! After all, there is no victim, no human being, and the images literally look like a cartoon, but it's the IDEA that it might promote something I don't like."

Yeah, sounds like a legitimate and well thought out argument.

[–] Caesarkid1 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Nothing good can come from people with a child fetish

[–] Wowbagger 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Sure, victimless crime. It's something I "dislike" and "dangerous art". You ignore the fact that it's banned in some countries, that there's a high correlation between loli viewers and child sexual predators, that objectively, it portrays things that should not be. Lolis pervs are into sexualized children but it's okay because they'll only ever think about drawings. That's a load of shit. I'll do my best to discourage that behavior, thanks. Free speech as our forefathers envisioned it was for political and religious speech anyway and there's nothing political about lolis, it's just degenerate sexuality. When Voat gets shut down because of it will you still be defending them? Probably not because you'll be busy with your pants down around your ankles.

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Free speech means free speech. You not liking it doesn't mean it should be censored.

[–] Wowbagger 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You realize they have a perfectly good place to do their rotten shit and they're just coming here to shit test and try to fuck us over, right? This isn't someone making an unpopular political claim, these are people who get off on cartoons of children in sexualized contexts. I'll do what I can to make such people uncomfortable, thanks.

[–] Shotinthedark 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago  (edited ago)

I agree. We might have a lot of contraversial subs on voat ,but pedo shit shouldn't have a home here!

[–] srgmpdns 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Strangely, both subs are NSFW: No

Really? SFW lolis?

[–] Shotinthedark 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Odd. I saw a guy on reddit bitching that you can't look at loli on reddit. Probably the same person.

[–] ExpertShitposter 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I don't often downvote, but when i do....i make sure its a 2D faggot.

[–] Rotteuxx [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I find myself downvoating a lot less than a year ago... where the fuck are @freshmeat & @9-11 nowadays ?

[–] ExpertShitposter 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Freshfag moved on to a different site according to dial indicator. Seems to have returned only now with the pedo squad, after a month long hiatus. Coincidence? And interestingly, 7-11 too has mostly fucked off. Coincidence?

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)