https://voat.co/u/PGIsDumb6
Member for ~4 hours.
12 upvotes in less than 3 hours, for a completely useless comment, thus giving the current account downvote capabilities for use in brigading(if I'm not mistaken as to the ccp requirement for downvoting?):
https://voat.co/v/technology/2979320/16203312/ | https://archive.is/xKU4H
Totally organic, I'm sure... /s
Note: As of this writing, the above comment has at least 8 more upvotes than any other comment in that submission...
User has created an obscene amount of accounts for use in spamming v/pizzagate and v/GreatAwakening, uses the accounts to get around being banned from subverses for spam.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/about/log/banned
cc: @Vindicator, @Crensch, @kevdude, @PeaceSeeker, @PuttItOut
Edit to add:
New account created in the last ~15 minutes:
https://voat.co/u/PGIsDumb7
https://archive.is/ZRfre
Edit 2 to add:
Also admitted to manipulating votes using alts:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2978232/16178697/1/ | https://archive.fo/Ti8q8
Edit 3 to add:
Another account and useless comment with likely inorganic upvotes:
https://voat.co/u/PGIssDumb9
Submissions: This user has upvoted 6 and downvoted 0 submissions.
https://voat.co/v/technology/2964685/16191864/ | https://archive.is/pS3Pn
^ Same as the first inorganically upvoted comment linked here, both simply say "Wow" and netted a minimum of 12+ upvotes. Curiously, both submissions were posted by https://voat.co/u/roznak
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2979601/16192901/1/ | https://archive.is/Nnxg9
Edit 4 to add:
https://voat.co/u/PGIsDumb10
https://voat.co/u/PGIsDumb11
Brazenly admitting to vote manipulation, right here in this thread, trying to act tough about it:
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2980654/16224422/2/ | https://archive.is/YJNZ2
https://voat.co/v/funny/2981843/16224460/ | https://archive.is/f1QjQ
Ironically, though, he deleted this comment once he discovered that it had been pointed out here.
Also deleted the v/funny comment he made, after it was archived.
For good measure though, here's a screengrab from his comment history: https://files.catbox.moe/ui86cj.jpg
Here's another screengrab showing that he's upvoting himself right here in this submission: https://files.catbox.moe/hyybbl.jpg
Edit 5 to add:
First downvote to this thread, received 5 days after posting.
Who suddenly became active in the last few hours?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] argosciv [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
That's quite a backpedal from saying:
I thought you said you have no information nor desire to know anything, yet, you've read the articles from @darkknight111?
Oh but it isn't.
Right now we're in a different thread discussing your self-admitted vote manipulation through the use of alt accounts, including your use of said accounts to subvert bans from, for example, v/pizzagate. Are you saying that it isn't factual that you're upvoting yourself, after having admitted to doing so? Are you saying that it isn't factual that you're using alt accounts to subvert bans?
Edit to include comments context: https://archive.is/AhgQ9
[–] PGIsDumb11 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
No it's not. That retard posted multiple articles showing that Robert is in jail. Coming back at him by pointing out that this disproves his I am Robert delusion because I wouldn't be able to troll him like this from jail is a logical answer.
Which was entirely motivated by the perverse irrationality he's showing and the disgusting falsehoods he's spewing at me, and not at all about a desire to know more about Robert.
OF COURSE I'M NOT SAYING THIS. This type of reality denying is specific to you pizzagaters, not me. Why would you even imply that?
[–] argosciv [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
You said:
Which can only be construed as not having any information or desire to know anything about Robert Robinson, the convicted pedophile.
Then you said:
Which can only be construed as you having information that he is currently in jail. Whether that is first-hand or second-hand(from having read the articles that @darkknight111 posted), or a mix of both, you do indeed have information. If it is second hand, you must have made the conscious decision to read the articles about Robert, despite saying that you do not want to know about him.
If you did not want to know about Robert, why did you read the articles? Reading the articles gives you information about Robert, which you claim to not have or want.
So, you're saying that it is a fact that you're upvoting yourself and using alternate accounts to subvert(work around) bans from subverses?
So, why would you then say that this is a place where "facts and reality don't matter", when here in this v/ProtectVoat submission, the core discussion is about the fact that you're spamming and using alt accounts to upvote yourself and work around the bans you receive for spam?
There's no denying the reality of your actions here on Voat, which is why I asked if that's what you're doing.
What's also interesting, is that you do indeed behave exactly like Robert Robinson, which isn't the core topic of this submission but it's certainly peripheral. So let's go ahead and add a third possibility:
* Similarities including but not limited to: The fact that you're spamming anti-PG vitriol and using alt accounts to upvote yourself and/or pat yourself on the back and to work around being banned from subverses.
cc: @Crensch @Vindicator @kevdude
Edit to include comments context: https://archive.is/jEWrM
HAHAHAHA! Holy fucking shit do I get a medal for landing an archive link with "jEW" in it?!