1
18

[–] Mickgoestojail 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

I don't wan't anything to do with this. @Needlestack was a former mod of this sub and has been a long time contributor to Voat. I'm very sure based on how they talk it's the same person. If they were wrong and they wont admit it then that just makes me more sure it's the same Needlestack. People saying it's not Needlestack based on what they are doing now didn't read between the lines before.

11
-1

[–] Crensch [S] 11 points -1 points (+10|-11) ago 

That's a very different observation than I've seen previously. Thank you. I'll leave you out of future pings should this continue.

0
12

[–] Mickgoestojail 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

There are plenty of people on this site that deserve your attention more. It seems now though that they are keeping you close.

2
18

[–] Cuckbot 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago 

This sub has gone downhill a long way. I think I'm out.

0
12

[–] Mickgoestojail 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

How's our mate doing?

1
12

[–] Cuckbot 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

He's devastated but handling it. Pm me next time. I'll be lurking not posting much.

9
-2

[–] Crensch [S] 9 points -2 points (+7|-9) ago 

I'm of the mind that knowledge about this situation could help protect Voat. I'm reasonably convinced that @NeedleStack is a bought/doxxed-and-acquired account. If it can happen to a previously well-respected username, it can happen to others.

If I start going off the edge like that username, I'd want users to post that shit here, too.

1
15

[–] Cuckbot 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

I'm not seeing it. I just see the SJW's laughing at us attacking ourselves. You probably pinged a few of them in here and don't even know it.

5
17

[–] NeedleStack 5 points 17 points (+22|-5) ago  (edited ago)

Oh my god this is too hilarious. This post? Yeah, I didn't post that. I didn't even comment in it. Don't believe me? Ask @PuttItOut to look at the submission and he'll tell you the same.

This whole abortion of a post you made and every argument you've made from it was based on you being wrong and you're using it to further harass me? Way to go!

Like I said before, I don't align with any group. That is something you made up to explain away why I could possibly have any criticism of ProtectVoat and SBBH. If anyone criticizes your tactics they MUST be rPV or Sane! Or a sold account! "We're so great, why would anyone in their right minds take issue with us??" Trying to convince users that your critic is crazy is another one of your tactics.

I've criticized rPV in the past for subs they've added to their sidebar and they removed one on my suggestions. And I criticized them in my post from yesterday for their pinging/harassing methods but somehow I agree with them completely? Your powers of deduction are seriously lacking.

So far in the last couple of days I've been proven right. I called out PV, SBBH, and rPV. And only members of two of those subs/groups have harassed me nonstop: PV and SBBH. It's blatantly obvious who the bad actors on this site are.

Oh yeah, I never said I harassed SBBH in anon subs like Triggly said. I said I have needled them from time to time. With a passing joke. Wow, such harassment. Much butthurt.

The way you guys have leveled attacks on me and others who dare to criticize your level of attacks (see how circular it gets?) prove what sad little fragile egos you have. You can't take a joke. You can't take an honest criticism. You attack and keep attacking. Notice how it never makes you feel better though?

You and your friend @PeaceSeeker now have resorted to believing I must have sold my account because gosh, I never heard of her talk like this before! I've always spoken like this but it was always against creeps like the Shareblue shills during the election (especially when I posted new revelations from WikiLeaks) and with spammers. For example, you may have noticed my brief yet turbulent romance with shill/troll JohnCStevenson?

"But we're just trying to figure out why she's so different!" So I must have sold my account?

"She needs to take a time-stamped photo of one of her creations to prove it's her!" I don't negotiate with terrorists. Edit: OK, that was a little douchey I admit :)

You're the delusional ones. Is this nuanced enough for you?

3
6

[–] Dkeere 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

As far as I'm concerned, you post content. Things you've made. Wtf has @crensch or any of the idiots at sbbh or whatever it's called contributed outside of drama and bullshit?

7
-3

[–] Crensch [S] 7 points -3 points (+4|-7) ago 

White knighting is a pathetic look on anyone.

Check my submission history - I contribute plenty.

6
-1

[–] PuttsDad 6 points -1 points (+5|-6) ago 

I know my words don't mean much to you but I don't think you sold your account. You are Needle.

You're also a great goat and despite the differences we had I hope you stick around.

8
-2

[–] Crensch [S] 8 points -2 points (+6|-8) ago 

@Rotteuxx @Laurentius_the_pyro @Rainy_Day_Dream @gabara

Oh my god this is too hilarious. This post? Yeah, I didn't post that.

Wow, then your conclusion that the user was talking specifically about you is even more batshit insane than I could have imagined. If OP that anon was referring to WAS NOT YOU, then why the FUCK would you even remotely think that they KNEW it was you?

@PeaceSeeker This bitch is nuts.

Don't believe me? Ask @PuttItOut to look at the submission and he'll tell you the same.

Yeah, we saw how you reacted when he called you out before - I've been told you were always like this, so I s'pose I'll accept that you've always been a raging cunt. Putt won't respond here, because it's unnecessary, you're showing yourself to be more and more unreasonable as this continues.

This whole abortion of a post you made and every argument you've made from it was based on you being wrong and you're using it to further harass me? Way to go!

Oh, had I known you were taking a random anon comment that wasn't even RESPONDING TO YOU as proof that someone in anon KNEW WHO YOU WERE, I wouldn't have even had to make much of a post at all - it would have been, "how fucking stupid is this bitch?".

Like I said before, I don't align with any group.

Nobody believes that horseshit. You've already been called out for it below. Throwing out a token "rPV does the same, but IN PUBLIC" which is also fucking absurd, since the people rPV attack are the ones that tend to publicly ping, and rPV almost never does, doesn't make you neutral.

That is something you made up to explain away why I could possibly have any criticism of ProtectVoat and SBBH. If anyone criticizes your tactics they MUST be rPV or Sane! Or a sold account! "We're so great, why would anyone in their right minds take issue with us??" Trying to convince users that your critic is crazy is another one of your tactics.

The only people saying that are sane and obvious alts. And you. Nobody has any actual arguments, just vote manipulation when 9-11 and freshmeat join in. So when you say exactly what they say when they attack others from anon and 4chan, it makes you look like one of them.

Maybe you're just a stupid thot, though, and fell for their propaganda. I thought it kinder to believe the real you was no longer behind this account.

I've criticized rPV in the past for subs they've added to their sidebar and they removed one on my suggestions. And I criticized them in my post from yesterday for their pinging/harassing methods but somehow I agree with them completely? Your powers of deduction are seriously lacking.

"Hey guise, I totally attack rPV too! But totally those SBBHers, a term only rPV uses, are really awful folks! I'm neutral!" Not buying it.

So far in the last couple of days I've been proven right.

About nothing. You were proven wrong at every turn, and the choices you've made are reminiscent of @she. Just keep digging yourself into a hole of being completely and utterly wrong - and being a bitch about it.

I called out PV, SBBH, and rPV. And only members of two of those subs/groups have harassed me nonstop: PV and SBBH. It's blatantly obvious who the bad actors on this site are.

Oh, it certainly is. One group posts CP, bestiality, gathers outside of Voat and whenever they show up vote counts get seriously high despite only one or two usernames actually being active in the conversation, and at least one of them has had accounts banned before for vote manipulation - the other group pings each other publicly, and does what they can to provide support for their claims.

Everyone knows who the bad actors are, and everyone knows on whose side you actually are. The people with positive ccp in this thread have chosen a side.

Oh yeah, I never said I harassed SBBH in anon subs like Triggly said. I said I have needled them from time to time. With a passing joke. Wow, such harassment. Much butthurt.

Oh, how cute, the backpedaling is just adorable. "I totally just brushed against them, teehee"

The way you guys have leveled attacks on me and others who dare to criticize your level of attacks (see how circular it gets?) prove what sad little fragile egos you have. You can't take a joke. You can't take an honest criticism. You attack and keep attacking. Notice how it never makes you feel better though?

You've gotten attacked because of your bitch-tier behaviour. Nobody wanted to think you were such a shallow whore, but it turns out you're really not what people remembered you being. You could have disappeared a near saint, but you decided to come back and show, (in some cases remind) us that you're @she-tier.

I feel just fine, and I feel better when I dig through your words and find out what bugged me about them.

I like how you're attacking our emotional state, though - does it hurt your feelings or something? I know you rPV faggots like to project your faults onto others.

You and your friend @PeaceSeeker now have resorted to believing I must have sold my account because gosh, I never heard of her talk like this before! I've always spoken like this but it was always against creeps like the Shareblue shills during the election (especially when I posted new revelations from WikiLeaks) and with spammers. For example, you may have noticed my brief yet turbulent romance with shill/troll JohnCStevenson?

Don't really give a shit what you've done in the past anymore. You used to attack shills, now you attack goats for holding you accountable for your attack on the owner of the site, and shitstirring. You're incapable of making a proper apology it seems, and even worse, you have no intention of doing so.

When I'm wrong, I make apologies all around, and everyone cools off and moves on. I guess that bar is a little too high for someone like you, though.

"But we're just trying to figure out why she's so different!" So I must have sold my account?

I remembered you being better than you are. I was obviously wrong about that. And why wouldn't users that remembered you differently think that? How stupid do you think goats are? "Oh well, user X acting different - totally still them though! DERP"

"She needs to take a time-stamped photo of one of her creations to prove it's her!" I don't negotiate with terrorists. Edit: OK, that was a little douchey I admit :)

Eat a dick.

You're the delusional ones. Is this nuanced enough for you?

It shows exactly why you're being attacked. You've gotten a range of responses from legitimate concern to thinking you're not who you used to be, and you reacted to every one of them like a raging cunt. There was no change in your response if someone even dared question your actions.

Nuance is something you definitely lack.

You're not on one side? rPV pretty much decides what side you're on with their vote brigade. It's not difficult to figure out that they think your actions are to their benefit.

2
3

[–] UrAShillHarry 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

what kind of insecure faggot takes the time to spew such shitty content to other faggots on a a shitty reddit clone hahahaha get a life incel

9
-3

[–] 12416616? 9 points -3 points (+6|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Wow, then your conclusion that the user was talking specifically about you is even more batshit insane than I could have imagined. If OP that anon was referring to WAS NOT YOU, then why the FUCK would you even remotely think that they KNEW it was you?

PeaceSeeker This bitch is nuts.

Wait wait wait. I read that comment of hers twice already, but I'm only now clueing in to what she's really saying. She neither posted that anon submission nor commented within it, and yet when she saw an anon commenter within that apparently random thread comment about 2.7 year old account...she for some reason thought that random user in that random thread was not only talking about here, but had explicitly identified her from some other unrelated thread? Am I getting this right? What the fuck?

About nothing. You were proven wrong at every turn, and the choices you've made are reminiscent of @she. Just keep digging yourself into a hole of being completely and utterly wrong - and being a bitch about it.

Seems pretty accurate, honestly. The fact that she's delusional enough to think that she's been "right" at any point since posting that disgrace of a /v/whatever submission is nothing but laughable. And the only people defending her (who are also paying attention to the facts) are people in anon subverses. Go figure.

Great post all in all, Crensch. She won't reply, though, or if she does it will be more "ignore the points they make, respond with insults, laugh off what I can, using a condescending tone as if that makes me in the right".

I'm not yet ready to believe that Needle is deliberately working with rPV, but I think it is clear that rPV have decided that Needle's recent actions serve their cause quite well. Putt wasn't wrong when he said her actions in her first drama thread were more in line with what Sane or Grifter would do. This has been a surprise for us all -- but you know what? When she pulls something like this again, no one will be surprised.

14
-5

3
17

[–] 475677 3 points 17 points (+20|-3) ago 

You lot take the internet far too seriously. So fucking what if someone acts like a failed abortion once in a while? You call them out for being a kike loving mangled fetus with autism and move on to the next post. Take each post as it comes and ignore the username that posts it unless they're clearly trying to make a name for themselves which should strictly be the name on their birth certificate. If they post using a pseudonym just take the post at face value and move on but if they're willing to put their real world name to their posts and build up a history to be judged by because they want to be in the public spotlight then feel free to have at them like you would any other celebrity.

8
-3

[–] TheAntiZealot 8 points -3 points (+5|-8) ago 

Take your own advice, hypocrite.

You're obviously taking Crensch way too seriously.

14
-3

[–] Crensch [S] 14 points -3 points (+11|-14) ago 

You lot take the internet far too seriously.

Truth. I take the truth seriously. Where it is doesn't matter. Would a man critical of a book take the book too seriously? What about one that held the author accountable for his words, when choosing the next book?

So fucking what if someone acts like a failed abortion once in a while?

Accountability might not be important for you, but I happen to like the idea that people can be held accountable for their words and actions.

You call them out for being a kike loving mangled fetus with autism and move on to the next post.

Or I could do exactly what I just did.

Take each post as it comes and ignore the username that posts it unless they're clearly trying to make a name for themselves which should strictly be the name on their birth certificate.

Take each book as it comes and ignore the author. If one Goosebumps book is awful, try the next one!

Or make a post about it and warn others that it's garbage, and that the author might not actually be worth taking a chance on.

If they post using a pseudonym just take the post at face value and move on but if they're willing to put their real world name to their posts and build up a history to be judged by because they want to be in the public spotlight then feel free to have at them like you would any other celebrity.

I don't consider the person when dissecting the words, but ignoring the name altogether really seems to not be prudent.

I appreciate your input, numbers.

2
13

[–] 475677 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

I get it, goosebumps was shit and r.l stine should be held accountable. This is the internet though where everyone has a publisher and can hide behind any name they wish. I could register a thousand accounts and call you a cock goblin and every variation thereof and you wouldn't know it's just a single person having a go at you. So my point is that unless a person is willing to put their real name towards their opinions they're effectively meaningless and should be treated as such. Some people you will agree with and you should absorb their opinions making them your own but for the rest you call them out on their bullshit and move on. There's no need to waste your life getting worked up because if you do they'll just come back under a different alt and start all over again. If this were a publishing house where it cost money to print our opinions it would be a different matter but when I can register and post here without even needing to provide an email address our opinions are as meaningless as the next persons.

2
5

[–] Womb_Raider 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

You don't take the truth seriously at all. You lied about discord. You lie all the time.

6
11

[–] lion_rampant 6 points 11 points (+17|-6) ago 

As a new user, all I see I Crensch drama seeking again. That's all I know of him. He claims to be a content producer, but all I ever see is him attacking users and claiming to be the victim when questioned on it.

1
7

[–] Womb_Raider 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

You think he's interesting? Keep tabs on PeaceSeeker and kevdude, tell me what you think in a few months.

6
-2

[–] Crensch [S] 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

Do you even know how to look at a user's submissions, little retard?

10
-7

5
5

[–] 9-11 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

@NeedleStack I told you.

3
5

[–] Womb_Raider 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago 

I'd been telling her for months, too. She will bring awareness to voaters in a way that I never could, because she's known for things other than whistle blowing.

3
1

[–] Nadesh 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

I’m just been curious here, what did you tell her? Instead of leaving an open ended statement, (that anyone can interpret anyway they want to) do you mind clarifying what you are talking about to Needle or are you shitposting?

3
2

[–] Laurentius_the_pyro 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago  (edited ago)

By how fired up RPV/SRS are I'd say you're on to something Crensch, no way they'd try to forum slide this hard if there wasn't something fishy going on, people are starting to catch on to them always accusing others of what they're doing so they're making up with a flood of posts to manufacture a false consensus.

[–] [deleted] 6 points 2 points (+8|-6) ago 

[Deleted]

12
-6
load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)