You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] 12251980? 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

You're so fucking stupid, it hurts.


[–] Crensch [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago  (edited ago)

The Romans considered it shameful to be on the receiving end of penetrative sex. They didn't make silly distinctions between 'homosexual' and 'heterosexual.' If you were facing me, I'd violently turn you around, have your pants down at your knees in a split second, and would be thrusting inside you in two seconds flat.

Faggots tend to not be aware that they're mentally ill. You should sign up for a lobotomy or electroshock therapy or something.


[–] 12256771? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Why are you poring through my comment history, asshole?

It was considered natural and unremarkable for men to be sexually attracted to teen-aged youths of both sexes, and pederasty was condoned as long as the younger male partner was not a freeborn Roman. "Homosexual" and "heterosexual" did not form the primary dichotomy of Roman thinking about sexuality, and no Latin words for these concepts exist.[17] No moral censure was directed at the man who enjoyed sex acts with either women or males of inferior status, as long as his behaviors revealed no weaknesses or excesses, nor infringed on the rights and prerogatives of his masculine peers. While perceived effeminacy was denounced, especially in political rhetoric, sex in moderation with male prostitutes or slaves was not regarded as improper or vitiating to masculinity, if the male citizen took the active and not the receptive role.

As long as you don't suck dick or have it in your ass, it's not gay, fucking stupid asshole.