0
5

[–] 12248426? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There were absurd comments voted up on both sides of that submission by a big margin.

1
2

[–] Crensch [S] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Notice the top comment is 4 days ago, next one 3 days ago.

Meaning that 14 of the upvotes came well after that thread was combed through by most people.

0
3

[–] 12248601? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Possibly but there is far more than on group on voat that regularly uses alts. Do you remember Sanegoat getting 2k votes overnight or his LordSpartacus alt upvote brigading here? Most of my downvotes are from downvoting brigades in this very sub like the 100 pepes. It's not just one group and its not new. There are others but I'd rather not bring up old dramas best forgotten.

3
-1

[–] MadWorld 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Meaning that 14 of the upvotes came well after that thread was combed through by most people.

That's one major way to farm ccp. Make some comments in old threads that are buried deeply in a pile of submissions/comments and upvote themselves! It's almost impossible to spot one.

2
4

[–] 12251980? 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

You're so fucking stupid, it hurts.

3
-2

[–] Crensch [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago  (edited ago)

The Romans considered it shameful to be on the receiving end of penetrative sex. They didn't make silly distinctions between 'homosexual' and 'heterosexual.' If you were facing me, I'd violently turn you around, have your pants down at your knees in a split second, and would be thrusting inside you in two seconds flat.

https://voat.co/v/science/2449417/12196980

Faggots tend to not be aware that they're mentally ill. You should sign up for a lobotomy or electroshock therapy or something.

0
3

[–] 12256771? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Why are you poring through my comment history, asshole?

It was considered natural and unremarkable for men to be sexually attracted to teen-aged youths of both sexes, and pederasty was condoned as long as the younger male partner was not a freeborn Roman. "Homosexual" and "heterosexual" did not form the primary dichotomy of Roman thinking about sexuality, and no Latin words for these concepts exist.[17] No moral censure was directed at the man who enjoyed sex acts with either women or males of inferior status, as long as his behaviors revealed no weaknesses or excesses, nor infringed on the rights and prerogatives of his masculine peers. While perceived effeminacy was denounced, especially in political rhetoric, sex in moderation with male prostitutes or slaves was not regarded as improper or vitiating to masculinity, if the male citizen took the active and not the receptive role.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_in_ancient_Rome

As long as you don't suck dick or have it in your ass, it's not gay, fucking stupid asshole.