[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

3
-2

[–] deejf [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

  1. That rather presumes that the current set up will not be abused, and yet it is abused, so "abuse" alone is not a sufficient argument against it. Would the abuse that exists now be preferable to the abuse you suggest would follow is a much more productive line of inquiry.

  2. I am unaware of any Wiki's "track changes" feature being "abused". Could you point me to a few instances? Such instances would also be helpful in establishing a real-world measure against which to compare, e.g., SaneGoat's antics.

  3. Accountability is a horrible idea? I guarantee you've never done any bookkeeping or accounting. In that background, the only folks who think it is horrible are embezzlers and other frauds. Granted, this is a different context.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
2

[–] kevdude 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

then delete the accounts which deletes everything he posted, but leaves his voats intact.

I believe @PuttItOut fixed this. Deleting an account deletes that accounts votes.

0
3

[–] Disappointed 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

One thing the goons from SDBH have openly said before, is they were deliberately trying to make a ton of useless threads here so we would either have to delete them or downvote them. Then you had the same faggots come over here on their main accounts and make threads showing how many downvotes we had compared to them. I believe one numbers guy is still doing this. What they didn't count on is just how many threads we would be willing to upvote.

0
3

[–] kevdude 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I believe one numbers guy is still doing this.

He deletes his threads now.

One thing the goons from SDBH have openly said before, is they were deliberately trying to make a ton of useless threads here so we would either have to delete them or downvote them.

Yeah, which is part of the reason why they lost. I love the fact that when faggots like @eggnogg or @mathgrunt tried to appeal to the average Voater, every outside observer saw that the people supporting them were obnoxious shitposting faggots. Really helped our case in all of those fights.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] kevdude 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Well stuff gets all voting shut off after a couple of months, but yeah. I did raise those concerns to @PuttItOut and @Atko when they shut off downvotes after 7 days, but despite what Amalek/Sanegoat/Mighty says they don't always listen to me lol.

2
1

[–] deejf [S] 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Didn't know that, but a bit aside from what I was trying to get at. Some persistence and documentation would be a good thing, I think, even if off of the "official record".

0
3

[–] kevdude 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Agreed. We tried documenting a number of things. The slimgur and slmgr shutdowns were like the burning of Alexandria for a lot of early Voat happenings.

[–] [deleted] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] deejf [S] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Really, Im getting tired of voat.

And yet, you keep coming back, despite saying this at least once a week.