2
17

[–] kevdude 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

I will say this. "Do Nothing" is not an option as far as I am concerned.

3
5

[–] squataclops [S] 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Case closed

Edit: case reopened by @DrWizzle

[–] [deleted] 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

5
1

[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 5 points 1 points (+6|-5) ago 

Sit on our keisters

Let them sort it out themselves

We ain't doing shit.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

3
1

[–] squataclops [S] 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

sshhhhh. The cabal is still on that... geeze you

0
8

[–] MrPim 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

What we can do is what we've been doing. The only ones who can do more are our admins and Henrycorp. Just mho

0
3

[–] Cynabuns 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He's posted in askvoat, if you/anyone cares to share any thoughts with him

https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/1089429

2
-1

[–] Sinful_Casshern 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

My horrible odor

0
1

[–] PIcasso54 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

My Hot Onions!

0
6

[–] RumpRangerRick 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

First step is getting @Atko to actually fucking respond to emails.

0
1

[–] squataclops [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

True

4
4

[–] dabork 4 points 4 points (+8|-4) ago  (edited ago)

But literally what do you want to do? You can't ban him, you don't have the authority. You can't stop him from posting, people will cry censorship. You can't really do anything. Most of his bullshit is being contained to his subreddits so you have no leg to stand on.

Downvote, block his subs, move on with your life. There's literally nothing you can do about it. If you want to start banning people for being smarmy little pricks we're going to lose a lot of members.

1
5

[–] Samchay6 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

But literally what do you want to do?

Primarily, block his aquistion of new subverses. Many of the subverses @Henrycorp moderates will die out naturally due to censorship. Why? I will give credit where credit is due, most of the leftists of Voat aren't looking for a hugbox. Furthermore, censorship of present subverses he moderates would constitute a legitimate reason why Voat should deny his request for new subverses. That solves the problem as I see it. Just like @she, @Henrycorp should definitely be allowed to be a member, but their influence as moderators should be checked as much as possible. No one except outright spammers (like MH101) should be banned.

0
4

[–] 5426390? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The one issue with your idea:

  • Currently, the rules of /v/subverserequest don't take any of your actions as a moderator into account for your future eligibility, so he wouldn't be denied by PuttItOut's bot if he moved out of an older subverse before he pulled the same tactic he used with /v/southpark.

1
1

[–] dabork 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

This I could support but then you have a rocky slope. Where do you draw the line? How much of a dick do you have to be before you're not allowed to request subverses any more?

While I could personally stand behind the decision, I imagine it would be met with heavy criticism.

1
3

[–] kevdude 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Downvote, block his subs

Seems to be the consensus of the site.

2
3

[–] dabork 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

What else can you do?
You can't "punish" him for his shitty posts any more than you can punish people who post to /v/niggers or @hecho for posting borderline child-porn.

We've made our free speech bed, now we have to lay in it. Part of that means we have to accept all speech, even if it's annoying.

That's the double edged sword of "free expression" if you can really call it that.

1
0

[–] squataclops [S] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Thats why the question was raised in the first place. @Kevdude and i talked about it briefly and i was asking the same questions you are. I just made the thread so everyone could get their $0.02 in. Im just sick of hearing about it period

0
3

[–] mqrmqr 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Imma send out a ping @HenryCorp

0
1

[–] Cynabuns 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You could tell him yourself, here: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/1089429

0
0

[–] HenryCorpIncLLC 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Don't expect a response. @HenryCorp is too cowardly to engage in debate, which is why he relies so heavily on banning those who disagree with him.

1
2

[–] ScottRockview 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Tell you what, my buddy says if someone makes some kind of "FUCK YOU Henry Corp (or something along those lines), image that is the acceptable size, he will pay to advertise it site wide for a day. I will hold him to his word and he will do it.

3
2

[–] mamwad 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

The drama is a symptom of an ambiguous user agreement and too many people who think that their opinions about how voat should be run are 100% fact. The way forward is to press the administration to actually address how moderators should behave. We need to determine which subs can ban/delete indiscriminately and which cannot. Due to the fact that the users do not own voat, this needs to come from the top. Atko and PuttItOut owe it to the users. This drama isn't good for anybody.

2
1

[–] squataclops [S] 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

I agree 100% @Atko

0
0

[–] HomerSimpson 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Well it has already been pretty well established that subs similar to /v/fatpeoplehate are left alone. Or are to be left alone.

2
2

[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Someone please tell me why I'm getting MASSIVE deja vu right now

3
-2

[–] squataclops [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Idk how I even got involved. I'm just trying to be the voice of reason

0
6

[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Life repeats itself

This has all happened before

And so will again.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)