0
8

[–] Scruffy_Nerfherder 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

IDK: CNN thinks this is a good idea so I'm inclined to feel uneasy.

1
5

[–] NeedleStack [S] 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Everyone got what they wanted. CNN/The Cabal got their missiles, we took out chemical weapons munitions (or true Deep State or Iranian proxy targets under a cover of wiping out munitions).

Remember last year when everyone in the MSM praised Trump for his leadership when he bombed the air field (again with not one soul lost)? It was another win-win.

3
2

[–] Scruffy_Nerfherder 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

This 6d chess shit is old. Put Hillary up against the wall and pull the damn trigger.

4
6

[–] theshopper 4 points 6 points (+10|-4) ago 

Fucking playing hot potato with the end of the world is in no rational way a positive strategy.

1
4

[–] repoman 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

"This aggression will not stand, man!"

2
3

[–] guinness2 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

You should write a letter to Secretary Mattis to let him know what to do! /s

Dear Secretary Mattis, I receive all of my military intelligence from Donald Trump's tweets and CNN and I believe your actions are based on ignorance...

0
3

[–] HarlandKornfeld14 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

So they want war with Iran instead? Great. Another war in the Mideast is a total whitepill /s.

0
1

[–] NeedleStack [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No war. Pressure to denuclearize. Look at what's happening with North Korea. Un wants to talk.

Last night's strike could have very well been done with Putin's blessing and as a quiet message to Iran. No one wants nuclear war.

We can get NK and Iran to further denuclearize in a way where everyone saves face. Iran already agreed to denuclearize in Geneva in 2013 and again in 2015.

0
0

[–] HarlandKornfeld14 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah right. Kim Jong Un is going to cling to his nukes now, knowing that they can deter US aggression based on false pretenses. If Kim thinks the war hawks have ascended in the Trump Administration, he isn't going to denuclearize.

0
3

[–] selpai 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I don't know what to think. No one is dead, again? It's a relief that we won't be going to war with Russia, and that thousands aren't dead... I just want to understand though. I'm so tired of lies and subterfuge.

0
2

[–] NeedleStack [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No one died. No war with Russia. What's coming out of Russia now is play-acting posturing. Last night's strike could have well been planned with Russia's assistance.

Last year when we bombed the air field (again with not one person dying), Russia got puffed up and said negative things about it but everything was hunky dory between us quickly:

After the U.S. strike, Russia said it would suspend its participation in a hotline with the United States military to “deconflict” or minimize the risk of mid-air collisions in Syrian airspace, but U.S. officials said this week that the two militaries continued to communicate.

“We are deconflicting with the Russians ... and we will continue to deconflict," Secretary of Defense Mattis said on Tuesday, kicking off his trip to the Middle East and Africa.

Source

0
2

[–] Wahwahweewah 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I get the feeling they're taking out Deep State-connected targets. Muh Russia is a cover to move in big-time USA military weaponry without creating additional hysteria in the MSM and blue pulled masses. Controlling the narrative... winning...

1
3

[–] NeedleStack [S] 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

You could very well be right. Wouldn't that be hilarious? I can picture the Deep State thinking they used Trump like a puppet only to have their own targets decimated. They are then put in the position of not being able to complain about it either. Perfect.

0
0

[–] avgwhtguy1 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

war with Iran benefits no one but Zionists

0
0

[–] derram 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://archive.fo/wo3aq :

John Salisbury (@5Strat) | Twitter

https://archive.fo/LJbmF :

WikiLeaks on Twitter: "Full video: Pentagon briefing with US Secretary of Defence General Mattis on strikes against Syria. General Mattis claims approximately 100 strikes (double one year ago) limited to chemical weapons supply chain and that there will be no further strikes. t.co/O1kZfmmJb2"


This has been an automated message.

2
-1

[–] dooob 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

I like his theory, it is the little optimist in me. You were quick to dismiss Q but u believe someone's twitter?

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)