Posted by: flyingcuttlefish
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/1/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 86
SCP: 0
3 upvotes, 3 downvotes (50% upvoted it)
~1 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
Sort: Top
[–] kneo24 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
7.52 billion people on the planet. The headline you give estimates only 1 billion affected by this "global food collapse".
Doesn't read the shit they're submitting? How about the editors? Naturalnews has always been a shit tier site. Thanks for further confirming it.
[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] ago
the idea of many more than locals dying is because of the spread of nuclear poisoned clouds of fall out circling the globe.
Yes, I read it .... but posting here as the 2 countries are nuclear armed-to-the-teeth and seem to have poor impulse control. You are welcome to disagree. I have no time-machine to tell if the article is correct.
[–] kneo24 ago
It isn't about the article being correct. It's about the headline being incongruent with itself and the article.
Had "causing starvation of 1 billion people" been left out of the headline, I would have thought nothing of it.
[–] Diggernicks 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Most of those people will be brown though
[–] Civil_Warrior ago
We can only hope....
[–] Inaminit ago
Why didn't nuclear testing in the 50's & 60's cause problems?
[–] Jimmycog ago
Oh no the care factor is 0
[–] goatboy ago
The most likely is a scenario is an EMP that would wipe out electrical systems throughout Asia. India and China would be the most vulnerable as their food dependency relies on a great deal of automation and the shipping.
[–] flyingcuttlefish [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago