https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8VhStIAs-w
Clearly, the harsh treatment scheme of Germans extended beyond the borders of Germany proper. International aid societies were barred from bringing in food aid and the US military distributed little, allowing millions of tons to sit undistributed in warehouses -- by design.
Morgenthau, a Jew, was deeply racist against Germans and wanted to destroy the country, turning it into an industrially-stripped landscape of farm laborers disallowed from building another military.
Popular histories claim that the Plan was never implemented. Actually it was for two years, from 1945 to 1947, before it was rescinded. In that duration, at least 1.5 million Germans died related to malnutrition, including a catastrophic infant mortality rate.
It's very clear to me this policy extended to ethnic Germans in the East such as my mother and her family who fled the Red Army's advance in Eastern Europe and ended up in the American Zone in Austria. My mother lived in a Displaced Person's camp in Austria for the latter half of her childhood. She described to me grinding hunger and severe food shortages including sometimes not eating for days at a time.
And that the US Army had millions of tons of high-protein meal packs sitting undistributed in warehouses speaks for itself. Clearly, the Roosevelt Administration felt it acceptable to starve my mother and her family for nearly a decade. The malnutrition my mother suffered was severe enough that it caused the loss of ALL of her teeth - and that malnutrition was artificially imposed by design.
My mother and her family passed through Germany on the way to the US in the early 1950s and my mother never forgot how the country was still bombed out. People were still living in rubble, hungry, years after the war.
But hey they were Germans so they aren't victims. Pass the mythological gas chambers, Zionist narratives, fake small pox blanket stories and traumatized victims of segregated toilets.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Joe_McCarthy 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
Germany was guilty. They started the war. I'd say we saw some good results. Germany became pacifist and a bulwark for post-war peace in Europe. It needed to be defanged and the effort was successful.
Now having said that you are exaggerating the negative nature of the program - if primarily by implication. The Holocaust, for example, was not emphasized much in those years.
More fundamentally is no Nazi excesses, no denazification. You absolve Germany for starting the war.
[–] 15116274? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I don't believe we were talking about who started the war, and who was guilty? The denazification happend post -war, after Germany was surrendered, plundered, and raped.
What do you mean exaggerated? They forced Germans to go to burial sites and see a bunch of dead bodies, to go to the camps and show them the recently built gas chambers, etc. The allies had complete control over all media outlooks, books, art, of course that has all given to German Jews.
No one is talking who started the war here, mass brainwashing of a whole nation is the key focus here. Of course the Jews were in charge of the denazification and as we can see, they used their tactics here in America too.
[–] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Denazification was of course heavily preoccupied with instilling war guilt. It was designed to bring to the attention of Germans that they started the war and that they needed to drop their warmongering ways. It was also about stamping out and discrediting the NS regime toward these ends.
The Holocaust became a huge deal after Hilberg published his book in the 1960s. I've seen US occupation propaganda videos post-war. Pretty anti-German but lopsidedly about how they were untrustworthy and needed to be prevented from starting yet another war. Rather biased and maybe inaccurate in parts, but nothing too extreme from what I've seen.
It is true there was a certain kind of denazification carried out here. Civil Rights activists compared segregation to fascism. But this is again putting the cart before the horse. Hitler made this possible. It is also overdone to simply blame denazification for the success of the civil rights movement. That was successful due to a number of factors.