This subverse focuses on topics of interest to the Western world from politics to high culture.
Free speech is respected here. Just please observe the following:
Please click New to see the most recent submissions.
Is Voat a fed nest?
Very possibly. Particularly in the system subs where brigading is possible. But this sub is an oasis from it. Their downvotes will have no effect on your CCP here.
We reserve the right to ban anyone we deem to be disruptive without notice.
If you are observed calling another poster Jewish on Voat you will be banned in this sub.
Sort: Top
[–] NorthernMan 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Hmm, maybe ive doubted the Christians too much
[–] recon_johnny 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
No shit.
[–] jervybingly 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Must disagree: the US Civil was not fought over slavery. By 1860, slavery was no longer economical since newly invented machinery could do farm work faster and cheaper than slaves.
[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The north fought to maintain the union, the south fought to secede so their could maintain their "peculiar institution"
[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
To say the civil war was not over slavery is tired nonsense. Though to reduce it to that is flawed. More important in that text is that more whites fought on the side of the Union than the Confederacy. 'White people lost' a war to maintain slavery is a weird use of wording given the context.
[–] Gottmituns 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The north and south didn't really get along to begin with. Though slavery was a catalyst, a civil war would have happened down the line eventually.
[–] Gottmituns ago
Outside of the few virtue signaling pieces of shit who adopt niggers, the evangelicals are doing the most for white birthrates outside of the Amish.
[–] performance ago
So almost half think it's a good thing? Jesus fucking christ.