You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] Flour 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not that I think Patrick Little is a psyop, but he could be doing a better job.

His rhetoric is strong and I like that. It’s just the language he chooses to use when explaining his ideas comes off as.. over-emotional?

Not a bad thing at all, but I’d prefer to see a candidate slow walk his Jew rhetoric and play ignorant to the fact. My ideal candidate says things like “no dual citizens in american government” “no aid to countries in the middle east whom have a lower homeless population than us (this can be used in many ways to highlight how much better off Israel is than America and we give them $30bil a year plus toys) Someone who promotes Traditional values (Always big T on Traditional), and doesn’t openly stand on the Israeli flag making himself easy to portray as a villainous anti-semite (anti-semitism doesn’t exist, just for purposes I use it).

The more normal and sane he can appear while bringing up the negative traits of Israel would be best at this point. We haven’t reached mainstream quite yet, but it’s close and naming the Jew with dog whistles is working well.

0
0

[–] Dudesocks ago 

Im on the fence about naming the jew outright and dog whistling.

0
1

[–] Flour 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

My personal philosophy: play aloof and ignorant to the real problem. Lay a nice trail for people to find the actual truth.