This subverse focuses on topics of interest to the Western world from politics to high culture.
Free speech is respected here. Just please observe the following:
Please click New to see the most recent submissions.
Is Voat a fed nest?
Very possibly. Particularly in the system subs where brigading is possible. But this sub is an oasis from it. Their downvotes will have no effect on your CCP here.
We reserve the right to ban anyone we deem to be disruptive without notice.
If you are observed calling another poster Jewish on Voat you will be banned in this sub.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 12818338? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
There were no "states" or "nations" as we know them today in 1000 AD. The feudal system was rather blurry on geographical details, and rather defined by feudal liege-vassel relations between people then by area, down to knights and the freemen and bondsmen within their knight's fee. Ecclestial holdings scattered through all of Europe that weren't directly integrated into the temporal political system blurred matters and exact borders further.
And particularly the Holy Roman Empire was very fuzzy and constantly oscillating around its edges, being an united and unified nation more in theory than in practice - day-to-day politics was rather decided by the prince-electors, and the Kaiser was largely powerless but for the power of declaring imperial free cities.
[–] TheRealMaestro [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The heavily decentralised nature of mediaeval power is noted by the cartographer: indeed, such allows Germany, Italy and Bohemia to be listed as extant despite existing under one crown. Still, many nations of our day already existed in one form or another even at this early time.