You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] McBiscuit_PdH 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

yeah, in jewgle I received more accurate results (actual inventors, not blacks who aped existing patents, making minor or non-functional "improvements") by omitting african: "american inventors -african".

And of course I got fewer results. I've had a few drinks, but is it possible they bury relevant results not including blacks if you don't specifically query with them omitted? Doesn't seem like it'd be hard to hard-code PC results, especially since plenty of people still don't know booleans or other search modifiers.

0
1

[–] dayofthehope [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They might have some hard coding or even an ai to give pc results. They are probably also messing with the page rank variable.

They must also be ignoring what actually people click through to. Originally, google would raise those results that people clicked through to the most often. I doubt that most people looking for American inventors are clicking through to the nigger "inventors".

0
0

[–] heygeorge ago 

I doubt that most people looking for American inventors are clicking through to the nigger "inventors".

I would wager that countless school kids (especially US) are given assignments every February on African-American Inventors. They google it, click on the relevant links, and bam, google's algorithm picks that up and has pushed it to the top, even assuming that if you search "American inventors" that you are looking for words to plagiarize about the invention of peanut butter.