You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not too surprising though that it was banned in a place once ruled by Calvin.

Do you favor bottomless too? Or is this some kind of typically European piss poor claim for unsexual nudity?

0
2

[–] Osweo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I really don't mind bottomless if it's out in the countryside. Nothing more natural than skinnydipping in nature. Just not at proper pools and riverbanks in urban areas. Different rules apply when there's concentration of people.

Toplessness can be unsexual, if you've not been brought up in 1690s Salem. I see it every time I go to the beach here. Nobody wants to get caught staring, so it works fine. Believe it or not, you can be trained to think of it only as sexual if it happens in private and with a prospect of fucking the girl who's taking the clothes off. Otherwise, it's not MUCH different to any figure-revealing clothing on an attractive woman.

Big gap between el Calvo and 1929, mind... I doubt the place was even majority Protestant still at that date, never mind Calvinist.