You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]Fuckbilbo110 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
The hear of the matter, the truth, is what matters.
Yes, truth is what matters. But we do not need to discuss the ins and outs of TimeCube theory. It just needs to be stated that the theory is not respected. That was a direct path to truth. When getting to the truth about Zyklon B, it saves us time to point out that Leuchter is no authority.
You tried to pull the same shit with the Simon of Trent debate. I ask why the Jews confessed, and you answer, "It happened all the time." And here I say that Leuchter is an eagleshigh, and you answer, "There are other reports than the Leuchter report too!" Well, you should have put that forward when making your case. Put forward the good, credible information, and leave out the discredited information. And that means not bringing up the Leuchter report.
Attacking credentials is retarded. Attack what he says. You still have yet to tell me about twins studies, why they're used to see heritability, and how genetics is involved. You still have yet to explain if it's genetic, why are only 20 percent of twins gay? Why are 11 to 13 percent of twins gay in the Whitehead cite?
Oh my God. Jesus. Don't you get what you're doing? Imagine if I said, "You still haven't explained how the flag was waving if there's no gravity on the moon!" Why isn't it enough to mention that NASA is respected, and the denier I'm talking to is an idiot with a high school education? Don't you get that I don't need to explain to you why the flag was waving? I can make a meta argument like, "If you are right, you would think all of the authorities that are smarter than you would also agree with you." Some things on the frontiers are controversial, and scientists can respectfully disagree. But other things have attained CONSENSUS and are not worth arguing about. I can act like an eagleshigh and ask you creationist questions about evolution all day, say you never refuted me, and give my creationist sources again directly after you refuted them and say that you haven't. After doing this forever, I can claim that the rest of your conclusions about IQ and race are wrong because they depend on evolution, which has shown to be false by my expert scientist who has all the credibility of Leuchter.
You are not interested in truth. You are interested in repeating lies that you know are lies, in order to spread hate.
So I don't have chemistry training, I can't say anything about the report? Plz.
Okay, how about you make some fucking claim that isn't a page long, or a paragraph long? How about some sentence about some chemical and the amount of time it takes to do something. Get that science fact. Find the fact in the IFR report that is wrong. Find the fact in the Leuchter report that is right. Tell me that fact. Don't quote a fucking wall. Tell me one basic fact about chemistry that the IFR report got wrong and that Leuchter got right.
It was wrong to us because of how much sorrow and death niggers have caused us.
You merely repeated this. Why is causing sorrow and death wrong?
Mauritania outlawed slavery in 2007. They're still doing it though. They also force feed their women. It's their cultcha, that makes it ok right? Obesity is attractive to them so they force feed their daughters in an attempt to make them obese. Who are we to tell. Others how to live right? If niggers want to hold slaves and force feed their women to become obese, why should we stop them? It's fine in their society. They're abnormal to our society, we're abnormal to theirs.
What is any of this about?
Niggers should go back to Africa. Then they can stop complaining about ebil YT.
Is this a scientific, historical, mathematical, or philosophical statement?
[+]eagleshigh0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]eagleshigh[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Race science isn't respected in modern academia, so therefore, we shouldn't do it right?
Put forward the good, credible information, and leave out the discredited information. And that means not bringing up the Leuchter report.
K.
But other things have attained CONSENSUS and are not worth arguing about.
Never question, believe what you're told? When people refute, dont believe it?
You are not interested in truth. You are interested in repeating lies that you know are lies, in order to spread hate.
I spread truth.
You merely repeated this. Why is causing sorrow and death wrong?
Animals killing humans is wrong and they need to be put down. Why is it wrong? Niggers kill whites in a white country. Bringing sorrow isn't wrong to the families? Making people sad and devastated isn't wrong? It's pretty universal that killing is wrong.
What is any of this about?
Different societies different norms. Is that right what they do?
Is this a scientific, historical, mathematical, or philosophical statement?
It's a statment that I want niggers out of my country. They're a net loss on our societies. We could save much money, time and sorrow not dealing with them. Fuck yoyr moral arguments. The safety of my American people is more important to me than the morality of sending niggers back.
If only Lincoln wouldn't have gotten killed. We wouldn't even be having this conversation.
[–]Fuckbilbo110 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Race science isn't respected in modern academia, so therefore, we shouldn't do it right?
Rushton and Jensen are fine. You should be killed.
K.
That's a funny way of saying a fact that was wrong with the IFR report.
Never question, believe what you're told? When people refute, dont believe it?
Don't believe eagleshigh the idiot who doesn't know how to make an argument and thinks he refutes when he does no such thing. Don't believe eagleshigh the idiot who thinks he knows more than the international community.
I spread truth.
You spread hatred and lies, and you are an idiot and a hateful liar.
Animals killing humans is wrong and they need to be put down. Why is it wrong? Niggers kill whites in a white country. Bringing sorrow isn't wrong to the families? Making people sad and devastated isn't wrong? It's pretty universal that killing is wrong.
So killing is universally wrong, but morality is subjective?
Different societies different norms. Is that right what they do?
You tell me.
It's a statment that I want niggers out of my country.
Who gives a shit what eagleshigh the idiot wants? What importance does eagleshigh the idiot's wants have?
They're a net loss on our societies. We could save much money, time and sorrow not dealing with them. Fuck yoyr moral arguments. The safety of my American people is more important to me than the morality of sending niggers back.
So you're saying, "I, eagleshigh, recognize that there's a moral option, and an immoral option, and I choose the immoral option, because I'm a fucking idiot."
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago (edited ago)
Yes, truth is what matters. But we do not need to discuss the ins and outs of TimeCube theory. It just needs to be stated that the theory is not respected. That was a direct path to truth. When getting to the truth about Zyklon B, it saves us time to point out that Leuchter is no authority.
You tried to pull the same shit with the Simon of Trent debate. I ask why the Jews confessed, and you answer, "It happened all the time." And here I say that Leuchter is an eagleshigh, and you answer, "There are other reports than the Leuchter report too!" Well, you should have put that forward when making your case. Put forward the good, credible information, and leave out the discredited information. And that means not bringing up the Leuchter report.
Oh my God. Jesus. Don't you get what you're doing? Imagine if I said, "You still haven't explained how the flag was waving if there's no gravity on the moon!" Why isn't it enough to mention that NASA is respected, and the denier I'm talking to is an idiot with a high school education? Don't you get that I don't need to explain to you why the flag was waving? I can make a meta argument like, "If you are right, you would think all of the authorities that are smarter than you would also agree with you." Some things on the frontiers are controversial, and scientists can respectfully disagree. But other things have attained CONSENSUS and are not worth arguing about. I can act like an eagleshigh and ask you creationist questions about evolution all day, say you never refuted me, and give my creationist sources again directly after you refuted them and say that you haven't. After doing this forever, I can claim that the rest of your conclusions about IQ and race are wrong because they depend on evolution, which has shown to be false by my expert scientist who has all the credibility of Leuchter.
You are not interested in truth. You are interested in repeating lies that you know are lies, in order to spread hate.
Okay, how about you make some fucking claim that isn't a page long, or a paragraph long? How about some sentence about some chemical and the amount of time it takes to do something. Get that science fact. Find the fact in the IFR report that is wrong. Find the fact in the Leuchter report that is right. Tell me that fact. Don't quote a fucking wall. Tell me one basic fact about chemistry that the IFR report got wrong and that Leuchter got right.
You merely repeated this. Why is causing sorrow and death wrong?
What is any of this about?
Is this a scientific, historical, mathematical, or philosophical statement?
[–] eagleshigh [S] ago (edited ago)
Race science isn't respected in modern academia, so therefore, we shouldn't do it right?
K.
Never question, believe what you're told? When people refute, dont believe it?
I spread truth.
Animals killing humans is wrong and they need to be put down. Why is it wrong? Niggers kill whites in a white country. Bringing sorrow isn't wrong to the families? Making people sad and devastated isn't wrong? It's pretty universal that killing is wrong.
Different societies different norms. Is that right what they do?
It's a statment that I want niggers out of my country. They're a net loss on our societies. We could save much money, time and sorrow not dealing with them. Fuck yoyr moral arguments. The safety of my American people is more important to me than the morality of sending niggers back.
If only Lincoln wouldn't have gotten killed. We wouldn't even be having this conversation.
http://m.imgur.com/gallery/oCjEPfy
It's only a net positive to ship them back.
[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago (edited ago)
Rushton and Jensen are fine. You should be killed.
That's a funny way of saying a fact that was wrong with the IFR report.
Don't believe eagleshigh the idiot who doesn't know how to make an argument and thinks he refutes when he does no such thing. Don't believe eagleshigh the idiot who thinks he knows more than the international community.
You spread hatred and lies, and you are an idiot and a hateful liar.
So killing is universally wrong, but morality is subjective?
You tell me.
Who gives a shit what eagleshigh the idiot wants? What importance does eagleshigh the idiot's wants have?
So you're saying, "I, eagleshigh, recognize that there's a moral option, and an immoral option, and I choose the immoral option, because I'm a fucking idiot."