You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] eagleshigh ago 

The article was thin on specifically why it wasn't the case as well leaving it down to "people being too dumb to understand the neuroscience anyway", essentially.

It's true. People get their information from articles that don't know what they're talking about. Average people don't just read science studies to know how to interpret them.

0
0

[–] BrooklynZOGHQ ago 

absolutely, if the author going to discuss it specifically, some examples to illustrate are needed though since I do believe a balance is possible. Instead we have MSM sources taking advantage of the distortion in knowledge to spin a particular narrative or perspective off of. Burden of proof is on the author claiming the point and blanket statements while somewhat true, don't fully illuminate the situation.