You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] WhiteSoIMustBeRacist ago  (edited ago)

Provide a reliable source of what the failure rate is of HIV transmission when condoms are used properly.

Not one item in the document provided that information.

Restaurants give you a bug that makes you sick for 24 hours or less.

Since you like the CDC

"CDC estimates that each year roughly 1 in 6 Americans (or 48 million people) get sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases"

Brothels can give you fucking AIDS and run the risk of doing so even when it's done "responsibly". That stays with you for life, spreads to others, and can even be given by a mother to a baby during birth. No rational person would compare food poisoning to fucking AIDS.

Instead of spreading FUD without backing up your claims, maybe we can look at an actual sex work industry that exists in the U.S....

http://www.aidshealth.org/#/archives/20684

"Since 1988, when the State Health Department first mandated condom use for all prostitutes in all brothels, there have been no reported HIV infections tied to Nevada brothels. Nevada is the only jurisdiction in the United States where prostitution is legally allowed."

So in 20-24 legal brothels in the state of NV over the past 27 years, not one reported case of HIV transmission.

Got any more unsubstantiated FUD to spew out?

ordinary sexual contact =/= prostitution because a prostitute is under virtually all circumstances paid to fucking essentially anyone.

From what I have found, licensed prostitutes in Nevada get tested for Chlamydia and gonorrhea on a weekly basis, and HIV & syphilis monthly. If they are found to have Chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis – all of which are curable infections – then they have to stay out of work until they have been treated and tested again, and found to be negative for the infection on re-testing. If they are found to have HIV, my understanding is that they can no longer legally work as a prostitute in Nevada.

I got to be honest here dude, I'd feel safer fucking a prostitute in a licensed brothel that is tested regularly, than any random sorority slut who MAY get tested for STDs every few years when she gets a doctor's check-up, or weeks or months after she starts noticing symptoms.

Oh, so anarchy then?

Oh fuck off, you know what I meant.

No, I don't think it should be legal for married men to pay whores to suck them off because they're bored with their wife or just don't care enough about their family not to.

So what you are saying here is that you want to make it a criminal act for a married man to use a prostitute. Is this what I am reading? And who would the state criminally prosecute, the prostitute or the man?

If you say the woman, than could you explain to me how it would be different for the woman to accept cash versus if she were to receive some other form of compensation such as gifts? Or even just affection from the man? If the woman were to freely avail herself sexually to the man, should she also be charged for some criminal act? Will this be a strict liability crime, or will there need to be specific intent to sexually engage with a married man? In other words, if the man takes off his wedding ring and bangs some slut he meets in a hotel bar, will she be criminally prosecuted in your world?

Or maybe you want to criminally charge the man with some kind of crime. Same questions apply. If the man has sex outside the bonds of marriage (or without the wife's approval), will he only be charged if money is exchanged? How about if he bangs his secretary, or some cute first-year associate, or some slut at a hotel bar when he's on the road? Explain to me the difference between giving her $200 vs buying her a nice dinner with a fancy bottle of wine and a nice bracelet.

And let's not forget that what he's really doing is breaking a marriage contract between him and his wife. You want to start criminally prosecuting people who break contracts? What sort of insanity is that? Let's start having the police enforce contract law. Wonderfully stupid idea there.

Fine, so your idea of "I don't think it should be legal for married men to pay whores" is silly to make criminally illegal. How about civilly?

Well, it already is dumb-ass and there's a remedy for it; it's called divorce.

Thank god you don't make the laws. But let's cut to the chase, you seem pretty bitter here. You've brought this "married man" scenario up a few times. Do you have any personal motivation for this? Mom & dad get divorced because your dad was caught schtooping a whore?

Really? No, really? We don't have a gun problem, we have a NIGGER problem. Don't tell me you consider armed, psychologically stable White men to be a threat to your safety.

I got to be honest with you, but I'm okay with psychologically stable black men having guns also. It's the unstable ones like the planned parenthood shooter, or the church shooter, or the school shooters, or the movie theater shooters that kinda concern me more.