You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
You can't build a movement (yet) off of anti-Jew sentiments. True or not (definitely true though) the current zeitgeist is still prohibitive of "anti-Semitism". Personally I too would prefer to be anti-semantics (and thus "anti-Semitic") and just say what I wanted to say - defending Huhwytes explicitly. Still though Christians and the "oh-no-those-poor-six-millions" Huhwytes aren't going to be able to get around the Jewish question until we've firmly established ourselves and credibility for our cause
Like I said - I do not doubt the JQ. I'm just OK with certain outlets not bringing it up. Like others said - that's kind of the ultimate redpill. It's the hardest one to swallow because they look like us and sometimes claim to be us.
People are receptive to the truth. Just back up what you say by posting links to news articles where the Jews brag about supporting the invasion. Like this one... Hungarys Jews Welcome Third World Invasion, Set Stage for Showdown It's easy to find such evidence, even in Israeli and US Jewish sources online such as Jerusalem Post or the Forward.
That's true. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be spoken of - just that you've got to be good at sizing up the audience. I spoke with one libtard recently, at work, and it didn't matter who I quoted - I was an anti-Semite and everything I said must have been taken out of context.
It does need to be brought up more; only that we can't have every alt-righter flooding the net with it. Negro differences are easy to see IRL - Jewish duplicity is much sneakier
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Germanic_Confederate ago
You can't build a movement (yet) off of anti-Jew sentiments. True or not (definitely true though) the current zeitgeist is still prohibitive of "anti-Semitism". Personally I too would prefer to be anti-semantics (and thus "anti-Semitic") and just say what I wanted to say - defending Huhwytes explicitly. Still though Christians and the "oh-no-those-poor-six-millions" Huhwytes aren't going to be able to get around the Jewish question until we've firmly established ourselves and credibility for our cause
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] Germanic_Confederate 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Great info though I'll use some of those for sure
[–] Germanic_Confederate 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Like I said - I do not doubt the JQ. I'm just OK with certain outlets not bringing it up. Like others said - that's kind of the ultimate redpill. It's the hardest one to swallow because they look like us and sometimes claim to be us.
[–] Cooner_McCloud 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
People are receptive to the truth. Just back up what you say by posting links to news articles where the Jews brag about supporting the invasion. Like this one... Hungarys Jews Welcome Third World Invasion, Set Stage for Showdown It's easy to find such evidence, even in Israeli and US Jewish sources online such as Jerusalem Post or the Forward.
[–] Germanic_Confederate ago
That's true. I'm not saying that it shouldn't be spoken of - just that you've got to be good at sizing up the audience. I spoke with one libtard recently, at work, and it didn't matter who I quoted - I was an anti-Semite and everything I said must have been taken out of context.
It does need to be brought up more; only that we can't have every alt-righter flooding the net with it. Negro differences are easy to see IRL - Jewish duplicity is much sneakier