You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Richard lynn, while taking true results, is well known for having small sample sizes and having other laws in his work.
The people of sierra leon are not smarter than indians. You don't see tons of bantu doctors, but indian doctors are everywhere. I like it, take this with a grain of salt.
Also, Skin colour has nothing to do with race. South east asians and indians are very smart, while albino niggers are still niggers. Brain size and race is more important (Indians are caucasian).
Yes EaglesHigh specifically mentioned about Sierra Leone being a poor sample. As far as India is concerned, there may be a lot of contrast in IQ between the people there? Remember half the people over there still shit publicly in the streets. On the other hand you a great many Indians who are highly intelligent.
The Brahmins are comfortably into high-ish triple digits, but they're like 5% of the population.
IQ doesn't tell the full picture though, as national wealth in post-Industrial Revolution is dependent in large part upon the particular personality characteristics of the population in question. It would appear that only Hajnal-line Euros have that "special sauce".
view the rest of the comments →
[–] JewsAgainstNigs 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Richard lynn, while taking true results, is well known for having small sample sizes and having other laws in his work.
The people of sierra leon are not smarter than indians. You don't see tons of bantu doctors, but indian doctors are everywhere. I like it, take this with a grain of salt.
Also, Skin colour has nothing to do with race. South east asians and indians are very smart, while albino niggers are still niggers. Brain size and race is more important (Indians are caucasian).
[–] redpilldessert [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes EaglesHigh specifically mentioned about Sierra Leone being a poor sample. As far as India is concerned, there may be a lot of contrast in IQ between the people there? Remember half the people over there still shit publicly in the streets. On the other hand you a great many Indians who are highly intelligent.
Also bear in mind this independent source also lists India at IQ=81.
[–] Caesar_Augustus ago
The Brahmins are comfortably into high-ish triple digits, but they're like 5% of the population.
IQ doesn't tell the full picture though, as national wealth in post-Industrial Revolution is dependent in large part upon the particular personality characteristics of the population in question. It would appear that only Hajnal-line Euros have that "special sauce".