0
2

[–] go1dfish 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Seems like this would be highly specific to whatever actual parcel of land or sea we end up on.

http://blog.independent.org/2017/03/23/is-a-national-government-necessary-for-national-defense/

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] go1dfish 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think it's a matter of scale and success. If an Anarchistic society did succeed and provide a realistic alternative to existing Governmental institutions it could be perceived as a threat and that would lead to attack.

If for example we grew to a scale where slaves of other governments wanted to use our private banks, the government might seek sanctions against us or our citizen's banks as happened with Switzerland.

Similarly if we got successful enough that we wanted to protect ourselves from that eventuality; the mere act of wanting to protect ourselves would likely be used as justification for pre-emptive strike.

That is to say history has shown the only way a smaller nation prevents larger nations from interfering with their affairs or outright invading them is through the development of nuclear arms, and that the development of nuclear arms is seen as an aggressive act by those same larger nations.

0
1

[–] SkinnyMagna 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Trade agreements with nearby countries can have defense provisions. That would probably be one of the first things to consider.

0
1

[–] Aducknamedjoe 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago