[–] [deleted] 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
11

[–] Statutory_Ray 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

*First worlders that get paid for being called bad names on the internet and live comfortably because of it.

0
4

[–] Disappointed 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What UN thing? I'm out of the loop here.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
10

[–] UberVileTruth 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Looks like he got banned for wrong think.

0
8

[–] Tom_Bradys_Vagina 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

If someone tells you they want the UN to regulate the internet, that person is your enemy. There are no blurred lines, grey areas or room for compromise. They're your enemy.

0
8

[–] lifeafterban 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

So its doxxing when somebody does it to Opiate, but isnt when they do it to other people. Typical

0
8

[–] M_W 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

What everyone else said. Also, how fucking pathetic do you have to be to run a detailed, multi-site search because a guy said something you don't like?

The world would be better off with a Gaf-user-targeted version of the plague.

0
8

[–] Statutory_Ray 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I don't recall reading the clause in the ToU that it applies to the entire internet and non illegal sites you post on can get you banned on GAF

0
6

[–] ThisIsWhoWeR 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Tyler and his butt buddies run the site the way a junior high schooler would: "it's my forum, and if I say you're banned, you're banned!" The ToU is just boilerplate.

0
7

[–] cirellio 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Looks like detective GAF is on the case! If they don't ban them they'll try to discredit by any means, using the same fallacies (ad hominem, straw man, false equavalence, etc) that they claim to hate.

0
3

[–] openly_gay_neocon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

ewww

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)