You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 12353128? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Looking this past week:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text from - https://voat.co/v/news/2473381

Everybody in Vermont should be mad a fucking hell! They're trying to ban 11+ rnd mags, PRIVATE SALES, and guns for under 21! Stop this shit NOW! - https://voat.co/v/guns/2467664

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/380928-biden-denounces-the-prostitution-of-the-second-amendment-by-gun

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html

/#DNC vice chair is calling for the repeal of /#2ndAmendment - https://twitter.com/bocavista2016/status/979726956307640320

https://gab.ai/hash/2ndAmendment https://gab.ai/hash/2A for more day to day.

Honestly, I am just fighting for freedom of speech on social media, and that knives/acid/trucks are not the problem. Then again, I am not in the land of the free.

People are being conditioned to accept a future infringement. "Repeal the 2nd Amendment" -> bump stocks, 21 age minimum, 10 rounds, only bolt action rifles, don't worry, you still get to keep your guns, provided you meet more and more requirements. That is our glorious compromise. Don't worry about acid attacks, rapes gangs, at least they're not shooting you. They'll only be 80 strong in the streets with machetes. The cops will show up every time to diffuse and save your lives.

Notice how no one is talking about BLM right now? Police abusing power against any minority might not be the best for the spring, summer programming.

0
1

[–] Dancing_Queen 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I saw the Vermont thing when googling but couldn’t find any of the other info.

The Vermont mag capacity basically makes any non-compact semi auto illegal to use unless you buy new magazines, retarded.

The Oregon Supreme Court ruled the same way as John Paul Stevens and the DNC chair explained. The Oregon constitution guarantees the right of citizens to be armed and the state militia is separate and will be armed by the state. In one of their last rulings the court decided the right to bear arms under the Oregon constitution was meant as mid 1800’s type of weapons that were around at the time the Oregon constitution was ratified lmao.

It only takes a group of men with 50 caliber muskets to take out enough security forces to obtain their modern weapons if it comes to that.

We have a proposed ballot measure for November if it gets enough signatures that will basically ban everything, including old bolt actions and lever actions if they can hold more then 10 rounds, even if they are tube fed or have a non-detachable magines .22 calibers are exempt though.

The dems and dem politicians won’t touch the bill, they know if they even bring it up they’ll be voted out and the state will probably turn purple instead of blue. Oregon is very liberal but they love their guns.

Also the funny part is that it’s two liberal church’s and a synagogue that have initiated the ballot measure. So many people have already contacted the IRS it’s hilarious. Churches and non-profits aren’t allowed to interfere with politics or they lose their tax exempt status.

At first it was reported it was two churches and at the bottom it mentioned the rabbi. After the ballot measure was posted online and the sponsors were listed people started calling all three of them. They even listed their churches as addresses and contact phone numbers lol. What morons, they can’t even claim they did it as private citizens.

The next day the news was reporting the rabbi was being harassed with thousands of phone calls and at the bottom it mentioned the other two preachers were also.

Hide the jew until he gets harassed like the others then make him the top victim.