You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] McFluffy ago  (edited ago)

Veto. Abolish. President cannot veto any bill. Which essentially means s/he doesn't have to pass any bill. So basically if house and Senate pass the same bill, it becomes law.

this already happens. the bill goes through the senate and house, then goes to the president. if the president veto it goes back to the senate and house where if it reaches a super majority it becomes law and the president cant veto it again. otherwise a rogue president could just veto any and all bills despite the nation needing certain laws to be passed, as in presidential term limits.

  1. Right to incite war. Firmly and unambiguously assigned to Congress. Pres can take ONLY and ONLY retaliatory action. Any other military engagement unapproved by Congress will be illegal and unconstitutional.

THIS. ALREADY. IS. HOW. IT. WORKS!!!!! the only thing this stupid suggestion allows is that the president can now have full blown retaliatory counter attacks. oh only one counter attack? ok fine, drone their main city. they attack back. OH LOOK YOUR STUPID AMENDMENT ALLOWS ME TO YET AGAIN DRONE THEIR CITY LOL. these people have no foresight.

also wars cost money, president has none of the government's money. congress does. the president has a lot of say but its ultimately up to congress to say yes or no. however, go against the people's elected leader and your congress career is over. i can see why people think that the president has the power of war but believe it or not, the president usually is not a dumb ass. if the president wants to go to war most everyone else probably does too. this however, does not include GHWbush and later presidents they are all traitor fucktards bombing shit for oil for jews/israel.

  1. Campaign contributions All corporate or entity contributions illegal. Only and only individual contributions allowed in any election. Capped at 2700 (or something) per person per year - including those self funding.

dumb and unenforceable.

also further down they made a comment about why the no veto power. "no one single person should have the power to decide what is and isnt a law." so ignoring why the president's veto can be circumvented in the first place as explain above, there is one blaring falsehood made that they actually believe to be true.

THE PRESIDENT CANT MAKE LAWS ON A WHIM. that is what "deciding what IS law" would mean. the president cant. there is a big difference between someone going "we are going to do this today" and them going "we arnt going to the fucking circus." same can be applied to OP's statement. the president only has the power to shoot down an upcoming law not ones already on the books. the president also does not have the power to make something into a law.