You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
It was mostly an economic dispute between North and South. The North and Progressives created the anti-racist narrative after the fact as a means to justify further aggressions against the South and any argument of States' Rights.
Victors write history. History is not necessarily fact.
As far as secret history, this was just another attempt by the Rothschilds and Royals to destabalize the US and/or force a central bank on us. The only thing that stopped them from invading the US was Russia; this arguably led to the Red Revolution as a sort of bloodline revenge.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Schopenhauer4ever 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
It was mostly an economic dispute between North and South. The North and Progressives created the anti-racist narrative after the fact as a means to justify further aggressions against the South and any argument of States' Rights.
Victors write history. History is not necessarily fact.
As far as secret history, this was just another attempt by the Rothschilds and Royals to destabalize the US and/or force a central bank on us. The only thing that stopped them from invading the US was Russia; this arguably led to the Red Revolution as a sort of bloodline revenge.
[–] joseremarque 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Yeah. The South had these "material interests" that they wanted to keep which the North didn't want to let them keep.
[–] openly_gay_neocon ago
Your hero lincoln wanted to send all the niggers back to africa.