You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
when your civil war happened, wasn't it people wanting to leave the union (and have slaves) and people not wanting them to leave (and get rid of slaves)?
if so, what gave the north the right to force the south to stay?
It was mostly an economic dispute between North and South. The North and Progressives created the anti-racist narrative after the fact as a means to justify further aggressions against the South and any argument of States' Rights.
Victors write history. History is not necessarily fact.
As far as secret history, this was just another attempt by the Rothschilds and Royals to destabalize the US and/or force a central bank on us. The only thing that stopped them from invading the US was Russia; this arguably led to the Red Revolution as a sort of bloodline revenge.
The North didn't. Lincoln just wanted to keep his power, and to keep the power with federal government. The Secret Service was created by Lincoln in order to make sure that there was only one currency being used in the US. This is just one example of the growing federal powers.
The interesting thing is not only the irony, but the answer to the question depends on greatly where you were raised. As someone who was fortunate enough to live in so many different places, you see an incredibly different world view. For example, in the Northern states and east coast. You will almost always hear the answer of slavery and that they were doing the right thing. To paint them out as heroes and freedom fighters for fighting for civil rights of all men rather then just white men.
Ask that same question in the South? And they will get riled up if you think it was just about slavery. Southerns, especially generational raised and long time residents are very proud folk, but they also treat the civil war with respect. You'll get a much more detailed story about how they didn't like the way the North was handling things, economic issues, taxes, etc. The aforementioned irony being basically the same things that the "Founding Fathers" got away from England for and rebelled / broke away from them.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] BillBugle 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
someone clue me in
when your civil war happened, wasn't it people wanting to leave the union (and have slaves) and people not wanting them to leave (and get rid of slaves)?
if so, what gave the north the right to force the south to stay?
[–] Schopenhauer4ever 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
It was mostly an economic dispute between North and South. The North and Progressives created the anti-racist narrative after the fact as a means to justify further aggressions against the South and any argument of States' Rights.
Victors write history. History is not necessarily fact.
As far as secret history, this was just another attempt by the Rothschilds and Royals to destabalize the US and/or force a central bank on us. The only thing that stopped them from invading the US was Russia; this arguably led to the Red Revolution as a sort of bloodline revenge.
[–] joseremarque 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Yeah. The South had these "material interests" that they wanted to keep which the North didn't want to let them keep.
[–] BIGBIGBIGBIGMEANIE [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The Civil War was never about slavery. It was about taxes and states' rights. The North wanted what the South had.
[–] makkawaffel 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Well you gotta remember that the North was profiting heavily off of slavery, which not many (especially libcucks) are aware of.
[–] pm_me_firearms ago
The North didn't. Lincoln just wanted to keep his power, and to keep the power with federal government. The Secret Service was created by Lincoln in order to make sure that there was only one currency being used in the US. This is just one example of the growing federal powers.
[–] Sea_of_Nothingness ago
The interesting thing is not only the irony, but the answer to the question depends on greatly where you were raised. As someone who was fortunate enough to live in so many different places, you see an incredibly different world view. For example, in the Northern states and east coast. You will almost always hear the answer of slavery and that they were doing the right thing. To paint them out as heroes and freedom fighters for fighting for civil rights of all men rather then just white men.
Ask that same question in the South? And they will get riled up if you think it was just about slavery. Southerns, especially generational raised and long time residents are very proud folk, but they also treat the civil war with respect. You'll get a much more detailed story about how they didn't like the way the North was handling things, economic issues, taxes, etc. The aforementioned irony being basically the same things that the "Founding Fathers" got away from England for and rebelled / broke away from them.