Posted by: SaveTheChildren
Posting time: 3.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/16/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 429
SCP: -2
5 upvotes, 7 downvotes (42% upvoted it)
~1 user(s) here now
This Subverse allows anonymized submissions.
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: Both
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SaveTheChildren [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Seriously, anyone with half a brain can see that all of those photos have in the least been edited to shit.
Where are the raw images?
None of those look convincing at all except for the regular satellite imagery of the ground.
You think this shot isn't edited in any way? http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/12/30/14/2FADE7B800000578-0-image-a-32_1451485652414.jpg
And then you need to explain to me why the stars are so visible in these shots, but the ISS live feed shows no stars. The inconsistency makes no sense.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] SaveTheChildren [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Are you defending those pictures?
Explain the inconsistency. How come those pictures have stars, but the ISS feed doesn't?
Hurling insults isn't an argument, btw, in case you didn't know that.
I'm claiming that yes, those photos are edited. I think it's really obvious they are edited. Do you think they are un-edited? That first one has the earth with a spot light on it as if the sun is a flashlight 1/2 a foot off the screen. That's not how the sun's light works.